Factors explaining variability in health literacy outcomes of public health nursing clients

Karen A Monsen, Singdhansu B Chatterjee, Jill E. Timm, J. Kay Poulsen, Diane B. Mcnaughton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate variability in health literacy outcomes due to home visiting (HV) program components including PHN, Intervention, and Client. Design and Sample: A comparative, correlational study evaluated PHN home visiting program data that included PHNs (N = 16); Interventions (N = 21,634); and Clients (N = 141). Client age ranged from 14 to 46 (median = 21, mean = 22.8, SD = 6.65). Clients were predominately White (75.9%), not married (84.4%), and female (99.3%). PHNS documented care using electronic health records (EHR) and the Omaha System. Measures: The outcome of interest was health literacy benchmark attainment (adequate knowledge) operationalized by Omaha System Problem Rating Scale for Outcomes Knowledge scores averaged across problems. Intervention: Program of individually tailored, evidence-based HV interventions provided by PHNs. Results: There were 233 different interventions for 22 problems. Knowledge benchmark was attained by 16.3% of clients. Four factors explained variance in reaching the knowledge benchmark: Client (51%), Problem (17%), Intervention (16%), and PHN (16%). Conclusions: The PHN and intervention tailoring are actionable components of HV programs that explain variability in health literacy outcomes. Further research should examine effects of training on PHN relationship skills and intervention tailoring to optimize outcomes of evidence-based PHN HV programs, and to evaluate whether improving health literacy may subsequently improve client problems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)94-100
Number of pages7
JournalPublic Health Nursing
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2015

Fingerprint

Public Health Nursing
Health Literacy
Benchmarking
Electronic Health Records
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Research

Keywords

  • Health disparities
  • Health literacy
  • Home visiting
  • Informatics
  • Interventions
  • Omaha system
  • Outcomes
  • Public health nursing

Cite this

Factors explaining variability in health literacy outcomes of public health nursing clients. / Monsen, Karen A; Chatterjee, Singdhansu B; Timm, Jill E.; Kay Poulsen, J.; Mcnaughton, Diane B.

In: Public Health Nursing, Vol. 32, No. 2, 01.03.2015, p. 94-100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{de976a5a2c804324b57919d994907232,
title = "Factors explaining variability in health literacy outcomes of public health nursing clients",
abstract = "Objectives: To evaluate variability in health literacy outcomes due to home visiting (HV) program components including PHN, Intervention, and Client. Design and Sample: A comparative, correlational study evaluated PHN home visiting program data that included PHNs (N = 16); Interventions (N = 21,634); and Clients (N = 141). Client age ranged from 14 to 46 (median = 21, mean = 22.8, SD = 6.65). Clients were predominately White (75.9{\%}), not married (84.4{\%}), and female (99.3{\%}). PHNS documented care using electronic health records (EHR) and the Omaha System. Measures: The outcome of interest was health literacy benchmark attainment (adequate knowledge) operationalized by Omaha System Problem Rating Scale for Outcomes Knowledge scores averaged across problems. Intervention: Program of individually tailored, evidence-based HV interventions provided by PHNs. Results: There were 233 different interventions for 22 problems. Knowledge benchmark was attained by 16.3{\%} of clients. Four factors explained variance in reaching the knowledge benchmark: Client (51{\%}), Problem (17{\%}), Intervention (16{\%}), and PHN (16{\%}). Conclusions: The PHN and intervention tailoring are actionable components of HV programs that explain variability in health literacy outcomes. Further research should examine effects of training on PHN relationship skills and intervention tailoring to optimize outcomes of evidence-based PHN HV programs, and to evaluate whether improving health literacy may subsequently improve client problems.",
keywords = "Health disparities, Health literacy, Home visiting, Informatics, Interventions, Omaha system, Outcomes, Public health nursing",
author = "Monsen, {Karen A} and Chatterjee, {Singdhansu B} and Timm, {Jill E.} and {Kay Poulsen}, J. and Mcnaughton, {Diane B.}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/phn.12138",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "94--100",
journal = "Public Health Nursing",
issn = "0737-1209",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors explaining variability in health literacy outcomes of public health nursing clients

AU - Monsen, Karen A

AU - Chatterjee, Singdhansu B

AU - Timm, Jill E.

AU - Kay Poulsen, J.

AU - Mcnaughton, Diane B.

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - Objectives: To evaluate variability in health literacy outcomes due to home visiting (HV) program components including PHN, Intervention, and Client. Design and Sample: A comparative, correlational study evaluated PHN home visiting program data that included PHNs (N = 16); Interventions (N = 21,634); and Clients (N = 141). Client age ranged from 14 to 46 (median = 21, mean = 22.8, SD = 6.65). Clients were predominately White (75.9%), not married (84.4%), and female (99.3%). PHNS documented care using electronic health records (EHR) and the Omaha System. Measures: The outcome of interest was health literacy benchmark attainment (adequate knowledge) operationalized by Omaha System Problem Rating Scale for Outcomes Knowledge scores averaged across problems. Intervention: Program of individually tailored, evidence-based HV interventions provided by PHNs. Results: There were 233 different interventions for 22 problems. Knowledge benchmark was attained by 16.3% of clients. Four factors explained variance in reaching the knowledge benchmark: Client (51%), Problem (17%), Intervention (16%), and PHN (16%). Conclusions: The PHN and intervention tailoring are actionable components of HV programs that explain variability in health literacy outcomes. Further research should examine effects of training on PHN relationship skills and intervention tailoring to optimize outcomes of evidence-based PHN HV programs, and to evaluate whether improving health literacy may subsequently improve client problems.

AB - Objectives: To evaluate variability in health literacy outcomes due to home visiting (HV) program components including PHN, Intervention, and Client. Design and Sample: A comparative, correlational study evaluated PHN home visiting program data that included PHNs (N = 16); Interventions (N = 21,634); and Clients (N = 141). Client age ranged from 14 to 46 (median = 21, mean = 22.8, SD = 6.65). Clients were predominately White (75.9%), not married (84.4%), and female (99.3%). PHNS documented care using electronic health records (EHR) and the Omaha System. Measures: The outcome of interest was health literacy benchmark attainment (adequate knowledge) operationalized by Omaha System Problem Rating Scale for Outcomes Knowledge scores averaged across problems. Intervention: Program of individually tailored, evidence-based HV interventions provided by PHNs. Results: There were 233 different interventions for 22 problems. Knowledge benchmark was attained by 16.3% of clients. Four factors explained variance in reaching the knowledge benchmark: Client (51%), Problem (17%), Intervention (16%), and PHN (16%). Conclusions: The PHN and intervention tailoring are actionable components of HV programs that explain variability in health literacy outcomes. Further research should examine effects of training on PHN relationship skills and intervention tailoring to optimize outcomes of evidence-based PHN HV programs, and to evaluate whether improving health literacy may subsequently improve client problems.

KW - Health disparities

KW - Health literacy

KW - Home visiting

KW - Informatics

KW - Interventions

KW - Omaha system

KW - Outcomes

KW - Public health nursing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925378397&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925378397&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/phn.12138

DO - 10.1111/phn.12138

M3 - Article

C2 - 25040680

AN - SCOPUS:84925378397

VL - 32

SP - 94

EP - 100

JO - Public Health Nursing

JF - Public Health Nursing

SN - 0737-1209

IS - 2

ER -