TY - JOUR
T1 - Factors Associated With Healthcare Clinician Stress and Resilience
T2 - A Scoping Review
AU - Usset, Timothy J.
AU - Stratton, R. Greg
AU - Knapp, Sarah
AU - Schwartzman, Gabrielle
AU - Yadav, Sunil K.
AU - Schaefer, Benjamin J.
AU - Harris, J. Irene
AU - Fitchett, George
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
PY - 2024/1/1
Y1 - 2024/1/1
N2 - Goal: Clinician stress and resilience have been the subjects of significant research and interest in the past several decades. We aimed to understand the factors that contribute to clinician stress and resilience in order to appropriately guide potential interventions. Methods: We conducted a scoping review (n = 42) of published reviews of research on clinician distress and resilience using the methodology of Peters and colleagues (2020). Our team examined these reviews using the National Academy of Medicine's framework for clinician well-being and resilience. Principal Findings: We found that organizational factors, learning/practice environment, and healthcare responsibilities were three of the top four factors identified in the reviews as contributing to clinician distress. Learning/practice environment and organizational factors were two of the top four factors identified in the reviews as contributing to their resilience. Practical Applications: Clinicians continue to face numerous external challenges that complicate their work. Further research, practice, and policy changes are indicated to improve practice environments for healthcare clinicians. Healthcare leaders need to promote resources for organizational and system-level changes to improve clinician well-being.
AB - Goal: Clinician stress and resilience have been the subjects of significant research and interest in the past several decades. We aimed to understand the factors that contribute to clinician stress and resilience in order to appropriately guide potential interventions. Methods: We conducted a scoping review (n = 42) of published reviews of research on clinician distress and resilience using the methodology of Peters and colleagues (2020). Our team examined these reviews using the National Academy of Medicine's framework for clinician well-being and resilience. Principal Findings: We found that organizational factors, learning/practice environment, and healthcare responsibilities were three of the top four factors identified in the reviews as contributing to clinician distress. Learning/practice environment and organizational factors were two of the top four factors identified in the reviews as contributing to their resilience. Practical Applications: Clinicians continue to face numerous external challenges that complicate their work. Further research, practice, and policy changes are indicated to improve practice environments for healthcare clinicians. Healthcare leaders need to promote resources for organizational and system-level changes to improve clinician well-being.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85181627100&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85181627100&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/jhm-d-23-00020
DO - 10.1097/jhm-d-23-00020
M3 - Article
C2 - 38175533
AN - SCOPUS:85181627100
SN - 1096-9012
VL - 69
SP - 12
EP - 28
JO - Journal of Healthcare Management
JF - Journal of Healthcare Management
IS - 1
ER -