Factors affecting farmers' willingness to grow alternative biofuel feedstocks across Kansas

Marcellus M. Caldas, Jason S. Bergtold, Jeffrey M. Peterson, Russell W. Graves, Dietrich Earnhart, Sheng Gong, Brian Lauer, J. Christopher Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Energy conservation has emerged as one of the biggest challenges of the world in the XXI century, and not different from many countries, the US has created plans and policies to stimulate renewable energy alternative. Among the important alternatives for energy conservation is the use of biomass energy. Despite these stimuli production predictions are not confident that production would achieve the planned target for the U.S. Consequently, the predictions raise questions about farmer's willingness to grow bioenergy crops or produce alternative cellulosic feedstocks. In other words, farmers and landholders may not be willing to grow bioenergy crops. With this concerns in mind, the study advances previous research about bioenergy production by evaluating farmer's and landholder's willingness to produce different varieties of biofuel feedstocks. To achieve our goals, we used a mail survey of Kansas farmers conducted from January to April of 2011. The survey contained questions related to how farmers make their land-use decisions covering a wide array of topics. Through this survey, we evaluate the effect of farm characteristics, farm management practices, farmer perceptions (such as risk aversion), physical variables (such as soil, weather, and the availability of water for irrigation) on farmers' willingness to produce value-added feedstocks (e.g., corn stover), dedicated annual bioenergy crops (e.g., energy sorghum), and dedicated perennial bioenergy crops (e.g., switchgrass) for biofuel production in Kansas, though the use of logistic regressions and marginal effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)223-231
Number of pages9
JournalBiomass and Bioenergy
Volume66
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2014

Fingerprint

bioenergy
Biofuels
feedstocks
biofuels
biofuel
Feedstocks
Crops
farmers
energy crops
Farms
energy conservation
Energy conservation
crop
renewable energy sources
farm
energy crop
Irrigation
Land use
alternative energy
twenty first century

Keywords

  • Biofuel
  • Crop choice
  • Farmer's willingness
  • Feedstocks
  • Kansas
  • Scenarios

Cite this

Factors affecting farmers' willingness to grow alternative biofuel feedstocks across Kansas. / Caldas, Marcellus M.; Bergtold, Jason S.; Peterson, Jeffrey M.; Graves, Russell W.; Earnhart, Dietrich; Gong, Sheng; Lauer, Brian; Brown, J. Christopher.

In: Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 66, 07.2014, p. 223-231.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Caldas, MM, Bergtold, JS, Peterson, JM, Graves, RW, Earnhart, D, Gong, S, Lauer, B & Brown, JC 2014, 'Factors affecting farmers' willingness to grow alternative biofuel feedstocks across Kansas', Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 66, pp. 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.04.009
Caldas, Marcellus M. ; Bergtold, Jason S. ; Peterson, Jeffrey M. ; Graves, Russell W. ; Earnhart, Dietrich ; Gong, Sheng ; Lauer, Brian ; Brown, J. Christopher. / Factors affecting farmers' willingness to grow alternative biofuel feedstocks across Kansas. In: Biomass and Bioenergy. 2014 ; Vol. 66. pp. 223-231.
@article{19895f15abe3453a854f68a542a39679,
title = "Factors affecting farmers' willingness to grow alternative biofuel feedstocks across Kansas",
abstract = "Energy conservation has emerged as one of the biggest challenges of the world in the XXI century, and not different from many countries, the US has created plans and policies to stimulate renewable energy alternative. Among the important alternatives for energy conservation is the use of biomass energy. Despite these stimuli production predictions are not confident that production would achieve the planned target for the U.S. Consequently, the predictions raise questions about farmer's willingness to grow bioenergy crops or produce alternative cellulosic feedstocks. In other words, farmers and landholders may not be willing to grow bioenergy crops. With this concerns in mind, the study advances previous research about bioenergy production by evaluating farmer's and landholder's willingness to produce different varieties of biofuel feedstocks. To achieve our goals, we used a mail survey of Kansas farmers conducted from January to April of 2011. The survey contained questions related to how farmers make their land-use decisions covering a wide array of topics. Through this survey, we evaluate the effect of farm characteristics, farm management practices, farmer perceptions (such as risk aversion), physical variables (such as soil, weather, and the availability of water for irrigation) on farmers' willingness to produce value-added feedstocks (e.g., corn stover), dedicated annual bioenergy crops (e.g., energy sorghum), and dedicated perennial bioenergy crops (e.g., switchgrass) for biofuel production in Kansas, though the use of logistic regressions and marginal effects.",
keywords = "Biofuel, Crop choice, Farmer's willingness, Feedstocks, Kansas, Scenarios",
author = "Caldas, {Marcellus M.} and Bergtold, {Jason S.} and Peterson, {Jeffrey M.} and Graves, {Russell W.} and Dietrich Earnhart and Sheng Gong and Brian Lauer and Brown, {J. Christopher}",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.04.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "66",
pages = "223--231",
journal = "Biomass and Bioenergy",
issn = "0961-9534",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors affecting farmers' willingness to grow alternative biofuel feedstocks across Kansas

AU - Caldas, Marcellus M.

AU - Bergtold, Jason S.

AU - Peterson, Jeffrey M.

AU - Graves, Russell W.

AU - Earnhart, Dietrich

AU - Gong, Sheng

AU - Lauer, Brian

AU - Brown, J. Christopher

PY - 2014/7

Y1 - 2014/7

N2 - Energy conservation has emerged as one of the biggest challenges of the world in the XXI century, and not different from many countries, the US has created plans and policies to stimulate renewable energy alternative. Among the important alternatives for energy conservation is the use of biomass energy. Despite these stimuli production predictions are not confident that production would achieve the planned target for the U.S. Consequently, the predictions raise questions about farmer's willingness to grow bioenergy crops or produce alternative cellulosic feedstocks. In other words, farmers and landholders may not be willing to grow bioenergy crops. With this concerns in mind, the study advances previous research about bioenergy production by evaluating farmer's and landholder's willingness to produce different varieties of biofuel feedstocks. To achieve our goals, we used a mail survey of Kansas farmers conducted from January to April of 2011. The survey contained questions related to how farmers make their land-use decisions covering a wide array of topics. Through this survey, we evaluate the effect of farm characteristics, farm management practices, farmer perceptions (such as risk aversion), physical variables (such as soil, weather, and the availability of water for irrigation) on farmers' willingness to produce value-added feedstocks (e.g., corn stover), dedicated annual bioenergy crops (e.g., energy sorghum), and dedicated perennial bioenergy crops (e.g., switchgrass) for biofuel production in Kansas, though the use of logistic regressions and marginal effects.

AB - Energy conservation has emerged as one of the biggest challenges of the world in the XXI century, and not different from many countries, the US has created plans and policies to stimulate renewable energy alternative. Among the important alternatives for energy conservation is the use of biomass energy. Despite these stimuli production predictions are not confident that production would achieve the planned target for the U.S. Consequently, the predictions raise questions about farmer's willingness to grow bioenergy crops or produce alternative cellulosic feedstocks. In other words, farmers and landholders may not be willing to grow bioenergy crops. With this concerns in mind, the study advances previous research about bioenergy production by evaluating farmer's and landholder's willingness to produce different varieties of biofuel feedstocks. To achieve our goals, we used a mail survey of Kansas farmers conducted from January to April of 2011. The survey contained questions related to how farmers make their land-use decisions covering a wide array of topics. Through this survey, we evaluate the effect of farm characteristics, farm management practices, farmer perceptions (such as risk aversion), physical variables (such as soil, weather, and the availability of water for irrigation) on farmers' willingness to produce value-added feedstocks (e.g., corn stover), dedicated annual bioenergy crops (e.g., energy sorghum), and dedicated perennial bioenergy crops (e.g., switchgrass) for biofuel production in Kansas, though the use of logistic regressions and marginal effects.

KW - Biofuel

KW - Crop choice

KW - Farmer's willingness

KW - Feedstocks

KW - Kansas

KW - Scenarios

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901591842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901591842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.04.009

DO - 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.04.009

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84901591842

VL - 66

SP - 223

EP - 231

JO - Biomass and Bioenergy

JF - Biomass and Bioenergy

SN - 0961-9534

ER -