Abstract
We zone out roughly 20-40% of the time during reading–a rate that is concerning given the negative relationship between mind-wandering and comprehension. We tested if Eye-Mind Reader–an intelligent interface that targeted mind-wandering as it occurred–could mitigate its negative impact on reading comprehension. When an eye-gaze-based classifier indicated that a reader was mind-wandering, those in a MW-Intervention condition were asked to self-explain the concept they were reading about. If the self-explanation quality was deemed subpar by an automated scoring mechanism, readers were asked to re-read parts of the text in order to correct their comprehension deficits and improve their self-explanation. Each participant in the MW-Intervention condition was paired with a Yoked-Control counterpart who received the exact same interventions regardless of whether they were mind-wandering. Results indicate that re-reading improved self-explanation quality for the MW-Intervention group, but not the control group. The two conditions performed equally well on textbase (i.e. fact-based) and inference-level comprehension questions immediately after reading. However, after a week-long delay, the MW-Intervention condition significantly outperformed the yoked-control condition on both comprehension assessments (ds = .352 and.307). Our findings suggest that real-time interventions during critical periods of mind-wandering can promote long-term retention and comprehension.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 306-332 |
| Number of pages | 27 |
| Journal | Human-Computer Interaction |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2021 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2020 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Keywords
- Intelligent UI
- cognitive science
- education
- mind wandering