TY - JOUR
T1 - Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory OHCA
T2 - lessons from three randomized controlled trials - the trialists' view
AU - Ubben, Johannes F.H.
AU - Heuts, Samuel
AU - Delnoij, Thijs S.R.
AU - Suverein, Martje M.
AU - Van De Koolwijk, Anina F.
AU - Van Der Horst, Iwan C.C.
AU - Maessen, Jos G.
AU - Bartos, Jason
AU - Kavalkova, Petra
AU - Rob, Daniel
AU - Yannopoulos, Demetris
AU - Bělohlávek, Jan
AU - Lorusso, Roberto
AU - Van De Poll, Marcel C.G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
PY - 2023/8/1
Y1 - 2023/8/1
N2 - Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation is a promising treatment for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Three recent randomized trials (ARREST trial, Prague OHCA study, and INCEPTION trial) that addressed the clinical benefit of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest yielded seemingly diverging results. The evidence for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, derived from three recent randomized controlled trials, is not contradictory but rather complementary. Excellent results can be achieved with a very high level of dedication, provided that strict selection criteria are applied. However, pragmatic implementation of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation does not necessarily lead to improved outcome of refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Centres that are performing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest or aspire to do so should critically evaluate whether they are able to meet the pre-requisites that are needed to conduct an effective extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation programme.
AB - Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation is a promising treatment for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Three recent randomized trials (ARREST trial, Prague OHCA study, and INCEPTION trial) that addressed the clinical benefit of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest yielded seemingly diverging results. The evidence for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, derived from three recent randomized controlled trials, is not contradictory but rather complementary. Excellent results can be achieved with a very high level of dedication, provided that strict selection criteria are applied. However, pragmatic implementation of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation does not necessarily lead to improved outcome of refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Centres that are performing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest or aspire to do so should critically evaluate whether they are able to meet the pre-requisites that are needed to conduct an effective extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation programme.
KW - Efficacy and effectiveness
KW - Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation
KW - Randomized controlled trials
KW - Review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85170226235&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85170226235&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ehjacc/zuad071
DO - 10.1093/ehjacc/zuad071
M3 - Review article
C2 - 37480551
AN - SCOPUS:85170226235
SN - 2048-8726
VL - 12
SP - 540
EP - 547
JO - European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care
JF - European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care
IS - 8
ER -