TY - JOUR
T1 - Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory cardiac arrest
AU - Supady, Alexander
AU - Bělohlávek, Jan
AU - Combes, Alain
AU - Hutin, Alice
AU - Lorusso, Roberto
AU - MacLaren, Graeme
AU - Magnet, Ingrid
AU - van de Poll, Marcel
AU - Price, Susanna
AU - Staudacher, Dawid L.
AU - Taccone, Fabio Silvio
AU - Yannopoulos, Demetri
AU - Brodie, Daniel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license
PY - 2025/9
Y1 - 2025/9
N2 - When conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR) cannot restore spontaneous circulation, the initiation of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during refractory cardiac arrest—known as extracorporeal CPR (ECPR)—might restore circulation and adequate tissue oxygenation. ECPR could substantially improve survival with favourable functional recovery. However, the complexity and time-sensitive nature of the intervention, high costs, resource demands, considerable risks, and complications restrict the availability of ECPR. Patient age and comorbidities, timely and effective CCPR, and time-to-ECPR are major contributors to the outcome of patients. The primary goal of ECPR is full recovery of the patient, but in some cases, transition to a long-term ventricular assist device or heart transplantation can be additional options for survival. In patients diagnosed with brain death or, according to local regulation, in those with irreversible post-anoxic brain damage, organ donation is possible after ECPR. Ongoing research aims to assess the efficacy of ECPR versus continued CCPR and uncover key prognostic indicators.
AB - When conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR) cannot restore spontaneous circulation, the initiation of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during refractory cardiac arrest—known as extracorporeal CPR (ECPR)—might restore circulation and adequate tissue oxygenation. ECPR could substantially improve survival with favourable functional recovery. However, the complexity and time-sensitive nature of the intervention, high costs, resource demands, considerable risks, and complications restrict the availability of ECPR. Patient age and comorbidities, timely and effective CCPR, and time-to-ECPR are major contributors to the outcome of patients. The primary goal of ECPR is full recovery of the patient, but in some cases, transition to a long-term ventricular assist device or heart transplantation can be additional options for survival. In patients diagnosed with brain death or, according to local regulation, in those with irreversible post-anoxic brain damage, organ donation is possible after ECPR. Ongoing research aims to assess the efficacy of ECPR versus continued CCPR and uncover key prognostic indicators.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105006989721
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105006989721#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/S2213-2600(25)00122-5
DO - 10.1016/S2213-2600(25)00122-5
M3 - Review article
C2 - 40456239
AN - SCOPUS:105006989721
SN - 2213-2600
VL - 13
SP - 843
EP - 856
JO - The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
JF - The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
IS - 9
ER -