TY - JOUR
T1 - Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
AU - Gaisendrees, Christopher
AU - Luehr, Maximilian
AU - Sabashnikov, Anton
AU - Wahlers, Thorsten
AU - Yannopoulos, Demetris
AU - Pooth, Jan Steffen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Deutscher Arzte-Verlag GmbH. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/10/20
Y1 - 2023/10/20
N2 - Background: Around the world, survival rates after cardiac arrest range between <14% for in-hospital (IHCA) and <10% for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). This situation could potentially be improved by using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), i.e. by extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). Methods: A selective literature search of Pubmed and Embase using the searching string ((ECMO) OR (ECLS)) AND (ECPR)) was carried out in February 2023 to prepare an up-to-date review of published trials comparing the outcomes of ECPR with those of conventional CPR. Results: Out of 573 initial results, 12 studies were included in this review, among them three randomized controlled trials comparing ECPR with CPR, involving a total of 420 patients. The survival rates for ECPR ranged from 20% to 43% for OHCA and 20% to 30.4% for IHCA. Most of the publications were associated with a high degree of bias and a low level of evidence. Conclusion: ECPR can potentially improve survival rates after cardiac arrest compared to conventional CPR when used in experienced, high-volume centers in highly selected patients (young age, initial shockable rhythm, witnessed cardiac arrest, therapy-refractory high-quality CPR). No general recommendation for the use of ECPR can be issued at present.
AB - Background: Around the world, survival rates after cardiac arrest range between <14% for in-hospital (IHCA) and <10% for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). This situation could potentially be improved by using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), i.e. by extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). Methods: A selective literature search of Pubmed and Embase using the searching string ((ECMO) OR (ECLS)) AND (ECPR)) was carried out in February 2023 to prepare an up-to-date review of published trials comparing the outcomes of ECPR with those of conventional CPR. Results: Out of 573 initial results, 12 studies were included in this review, among them three randomized controlled trials comparing ECPR with CPR, involving a total of 420 patients. The survival rates for ECPR ranged from 20% to 43% for OHCA and 20% to 30.4% for IHCA. Most of the publications were associated with a high degree of bias and a low level of evidence. Conclusion: ECPR can potentially improve survival rates after cardiac arrest compared to conventional CPR when used in experienced, high-volume centers in highly selected patients (young age, initial shockable rhythm, witnessed cardiac arrest, therapy-refractory high-quality CPR). No general recommendation for the use of ECPR can be issued at present.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177103512&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85177103512&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0189
DO - 10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0189
M3 - Review article
C2 - 37656466
AN - SCOPUS:85177103512
SN - 1866-0452
VL - 120
SP - 703
EP - 710
JO - Deutsches Arzteblatt International
JF - Deutsches Arzteblatt International
IS - 42
ER -