Exploring the role of parental proximity in the maternal–neonate bond and parental investment in moose (Alces alces) through postcapture movement dynamics

Glenn D. DelGiudice, Mohsen Ahmadkhani, Véronique St-Louis, William J. Severud, Tyler R. Obermoller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Disturbance can induce some dams to abandon their neonates, whereas others continue parental investment. Understanding the variability of the dam–neonate bond and parental investment of large, mobile species, reclusive during calving, such as moose (Alces alces), can be challenging. Advances in global positioning system (GPS) collar technology and analytical approaches allowed us to better understand the role that dam–neonate proximity plays in maintaining the maternal–neonate bond and maternal investment. In 2013 and 2014, we used movement behavior of 50 free-ranging GPS-collared dams and their 74 GPS-collared neonates during 96 hr postcapture/release of neonates to examine home range (HR) sizes, overlap of their HRs, reunions (≤26 m), and dynamic interactions of their movements. Mean area of 95% kernel density estimator (KDE) HRs of neonates (23.5 ha) not abandoned by their dams was more than 2 times that of abandoned neonates (10.4 ha). Mean HR area of dams continuing to invest in their neonates (104 ha) was smaller than that (897 ha) of abandoning dams. Mean overlap of core (50% KDE) and 95% KDE HRs of dam–neonate pairs when investment continued was 38.7% and 42%, whereas corresponding overlap of HRs associated with abandonment was 0.1% and 2.7%. Mean proportion of pairwise hourly location-fixes indicative of reunions of dams investing in their neonates was 0.37 and occurred at a mean interval of 2.7 hr. A stronger (p ≤.05) interaction of mean hourly distances moved (did) between dams investing in their neonates was associated with closer proximity compared with dams abandoning neonates. Our collective data indicate that the spatial proximity of dams investing in their neonates, and their stronger bond, nurtured neonate vitality in a way that reinforced continued investment. In contrast, the abandoning behavior of more distant dams had a diminishing influence on viability of their neonates via nutritional deprivation and limited reciprocal stimulation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)8699-8712
Number of pages14
JournalEcology and Evolution
Volume11
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - May 24 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We thank the many individuals that assisted in so many ways to facilitate this more thorough examination of maternal–neonate bond, parental investment, and rejection of moose neonates, including K. J. Foshay, T. A. Enright, L. M. Ross, M. J. Haas, A. Wuenschmann, A. G. Armien, J. H. Giudice, B. R. Patterson, M. Carstensen, E. C. Hildebrand, M. H. Dexter, R. A. Moen, A. M. McGraw, R. G. Wright, J. D. Forester, M. W. Schrage, M. A. Larson, L. Cornicelli, J. M. Rasmussen, T. J. Kreeger, J. A. Crouse, and J. H. Weickert. Technical and other support was provided by Vectronic Aerospace, the University of Minnesota's Departments of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology and Geography, Environment, and Society. This study was funded by the MNDNR Section of Wildlife and Wildlife Populations and Research Unit, Minnesota Environmental and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF), Wildlife Restoration (Pittman‐Robertson) Program, and the National Science Foundation, with supplemental funding from the Minnesota Deer Hunters Association.

Funding Information:
We thank the many individuals that assisted in so many ways to facilitate this more thorough examination of maternal?neonate bond, parental investment, and rejection of moose neonates, including K. J. Foshay, T. A. Enright, L. M. Ross, M. J. Haas, A. Wuenschmann, A. G. Armien, J. H. Giudice, B. R. Patterson, M. Carstensen, E. C. Hildebrand, M. H. Dexter, R. A. Moen, A. M. McGraw, R. G. Wright, J. D. Forester, M. W. Schrage, M. A. Larson, L. Cornicelli, J. M. Rasmussen, T. J. Kreeger, J. A. Crouse, and J. H. Weickert. Technical and other support was provided by Vectronic Aerospace, the University of Minnesota's Departments of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology and Geography, Environment, and Society. This study was funded by the MNDNR Section of Wildlife and Wildlife Populations and Research Unit, Minnesota Environmental and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF), Wildlife Restoration (Pittman-Robertson) Program, and the National Science Foundation, with supplemental funding from the Minnesota Deer Hunters Association.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords

  • abandonment
  • Alces alces
  • maternal–neonate bond
  • moose
  • neonates
  • parental investment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring the role of parental proximity in the maternal–neonate bond and parental investment in moose (Alces alces) through postcapture movement dynamics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this