TY - JOUR
T1 - Exploring the Factor Structure of the RTI Readiness and Implementation Survey
AU - Fan, Chung Hau
AU - Zhang, Yanchen
AU - Cook, Clayton R.
AU - Yang, Nai Jiin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, © 2018 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2018/10/2
Y1 - 2018/10/2
N2 - Response to intervention (RtI) models have increasingly been adopted to improve outcomes for all students through the delivery of a continuum of supports and making timely responsive instructional decisions based on data. With this increasing popularity, researchers and practitioners have developed several RtI-related assessments, many of which have no known psychometric properties. As a result, there is an urgent need to develop psychometrically sound RtI readiness and implementation assessments that possess technical adequacy and practical utility. This study surveyed 377 participants to examine the factor structure of the author-developed RtI survey. An exploratory factor analysis identified seven relevant factors (system support, belief, conceptual knowledge, practical knowledge, resource, time, and system barrier) from the initial pool of 49 items. Results of reliability estimates supported the internal consistency of each subscale. Collectively, this validated RtI survey can be used to help district and school leaders efficiently screen a system's current RtI readiness and implementation status. The data may also inform successful RtI initiation and sustainment of the reform. Limitations and future directions for research are discussed.
AB - Response to intervention (RtI) models have increasingly been adopted to improve outcomes for all students through the delivery of a continuum of supports and making timely responsive instructional decisions based on data. With this increasing popularity, researchers and practitioners have developed several RtI-related assessments, many of which have no known psychometric properties. As a result, there is an urgent need to develop psychometrically sound RtI readiness and implementation assessments that possess technical adequacy and practical utility. This study surveyed 377 participants to examine the factor structure of the author-developed RtI survey. An exploratory factor analysis identified seven relevant factors (system support, belief, conceptual knowledge, practical knowledge, resource, time, and system barrier) from the initial pool of 49 items. Results of reliability estimates supported the internal consistency of each subscale. Collectively, this validated RtI survey can be used to help district and school leaders efficiently screen a system's current RtI readiness and implementation status. The data may also inform successful RtI initiation and sustainment of the reform. Limitations and future directions for research are discussed.
KW - Response to intervention
KW - RtI implementation
KW - systemic assessment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046013638&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046013638&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15377903.2018.1458673
DO - 10.1080/15377903.2018.1458673
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85046013638
SN - 1537-7903
VL - 34
SP - 360
EP - 387
JO - Journal of Applied School Psychology
JF - Journal of Applied School Psychology
IS - 4
ER -