Exploring tensions and conflicts in invasive species management: The case of Asian carp

Adam E. Kokotovich, David A. Andow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

There is a growing recognition that scientific and social conflict pervades invasive species management, but there is a need for empirical work that can help better understand these conflicts and how they can be addressed. We examined the tensions and conflicts facing invasive Asian carp management in Minnesota by conducting 16 in-depth interviews with state and federal agency officials, academics, and stakeholders. Interviewees discussed the tensions and conflicts they saw impacting management, their implications, and what could be done to address them. We found three key areas of conflict and tension in Asian carp management: 1) scientific uncertainty concerning the impacts of Asian carp and the efficacy and non-target effects of possible management actions; 2) social uncertainty concerning both the lack of societal agreement on how to respond to Asian carp and the need to avoid acting from apathy and/or fear; and 3) the desired approach to research and management – whether it is informed by “political need” or “biological reality”. Our study of these tensions and conflicts reveals their importance to Asian carp management and to invasive species management, more broadly. We conclude with a discussion of possible ways to address these areas of tension and conflict, including the potential of deliberative, participatory approaches to risk-related decision making and the need to productively engage with apathy and fear.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)105-112
Number of pages8
JournalEnvironmental Science and Policy
Volume69
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

Fingerprint

conflict
invasive species
apathy
uncertainty
anxiety
social conflict
academic
stakeholder
reality
decision making
action
interview
risk
area
impact
effect
research
participatory approach

Keywords

  • Apathy/fear
  • Asian carp
  • Invasive species management
  • Participation
  • Scientific uncertainty
  • Social uncertainty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Exploring tensions and conflicts in invasive species management : The case of Asian carp. / Kokotovich, Adam E.; Andow, David A.

In: Environmental Science and Policy, Vol. 69, 01.03.2017, p. 105-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kokotovich, Adam E.; Andow, David A. / Exploring tensions and conflicts in invasive species management : The case of Asian carp.

In: Environmental Science and Policy, Vol. 69, 01.03.2017, p. 105-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a40ebaaf210644d6acf781cb933275fc,
title = "Exploring tensions and conflicts in invasive species management: The case of Asian carp",
abstract = "There is a growing recognition that scientific and social conflict pervades invasive species management, but there is a need for empirical work that can help better understand these conflicts and how they can be addressed. We examined the tensions and conflicts facing invasive Asian carp management in Minnesota by conducting 16 in-depth interviews with state and federal agency officials, academics, and stakeholders. Interviewees discussed the tensions and conflicts they saw impacting management, their implications, and what could be done to address them. We found three key areas of conflict and tension in Asian carp management: 1) scientific uncertainty concerning the impacts of Asian carp and the efficacy and non-target effects of possible management actions; 2) social uncertainty concerning both the lack of societal agreement on how to respond to Asian carp and the need to avoid acting from apathy and/or fear; and 3) the desired approach to research and management – whether it is informed by “political need” or “biological reality”. Our study of these tensions and conflicts reveals their importance to Asian carp management and to invasive species management, more broadly. We conclude with a discussion of possible ways to address these areas of tension and conflict, including the potential of deliberative, participatory approaches to risk-related decision making and the need to productively engage with apathy and fear.",
keywords = "Apathy/fear, Asian carp, Invasive species management, Participation, Scientific uncertainty, Social uncertainty",
author = "Kokotovich, {Adam E.} and Andow, {David A.}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.envsci.2016.12.016",
volume = "69",
pages = "105--112",
journal = "Environmental Science and Policy",
issn = "1462-9011",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring tensions and conflicts in invasive species management

T2 - Environmental Science and Policy

AU - Kokotovich,Adam E.

AU - Andow,David A.

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - There is a growing recognition that scientific and social conflict pervades invasive species management, but there is a need for empirical work that can help better understand these conflicts and how they can be addressed. We examined the tensions and conflicts facing invasive Asian carp management in Minnesota by conducting 16 in-depth interviews with state and federal agency officials, academics, and stakeholders. Interviewees discussed the tensions and conflicts they saw impacting management, their implications, and what could be done to address them. We found three key areas of conflict and tension in Asian carp management: 1) scientific uncertainty concerning the impacts of Asian carp and the efficacy and non-target effects of possible management actions; 2) social uncertainty concerning both the lack of societal agreement on how to respond to Asian carp and the need to avoid acting from apathy and/or fear; and 3) the desired approach to research and management – whether it is informed by “political need” or “biological reality”. Our study of these tensions and conflicts reveals their importance to Asian carp management and to invasive species management, more broadly. We conclude with a discussion of possible ways to address these areas of tension and conflict, including the potential of deliberative, participatory approaches to risk-related decision making and the need to productively engage with apathy and fear.

AB - There is a growing recognition that scientific and social conflict pervades invasive species management, but there is a need for empirical work that can help better understand these conflicts and how they can be addressed. We examined the tensions and conflicts facing invasive Asian carp management in Minnesota by conducting 16 in-depth interviews with state and federal agency officials, academics, and stakeholders. Interviewees discussed the tensions and conflicts they saw impacting management, their implications, and what could be done to address them. We found three key areas of conflict and tension in Asian carp management: 1) scientific uncertainty concerning the impacts of Asian carp and the efficacy and non-target effects of possible management actions; 2) social uncertainty concerning both the lack of societal agreement on how to respond to Asian carp and the need to avoid acting from apathy and/or fear; and 3) the desired approach to research and management – whether it is informed by “political need” or “biological reality”. Our study of these tensions and conflicts reveals their importance to Asian carp management and to invasive species management, more broadly. We conclude with a discussion of possible ways to address these areas of tension and conflict, including the potential of deliberative, participatory approaches to risk-related decision making and the need to productively engage with apathy and fear.

KW - Apathy/fear

KW - Asian carp

KW - Invasive species management

KW - Participation

KW - Scientific uncertainty

KW - Social uncertainty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008616580&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85008616580&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.12.016

DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.12.016

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 105

EP - 112

JO - Environmental Science and Policy

JF - Environmental Science and Policy

SN - 1462-9011

ER -