Exploring Professional Development for New Investigators Underrepresented in the Federally Funded Biomedical Research Workforce

Japera Hemming, Kristin Eide, Eileen Harwood, Ratib Ali, Zhu Zhu, Jason Cutler, Dedra S. Buchwald, Jeffrey Engler, Harlan P. Jones, Spero M. Manson, Richard McGee, Kolawole S. Okuyemi, Elizabeth Ofili, Nancy Schwartz, Clifford Steer, Anne Marie Weber-Main, Jamboor K. Vishwanatha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The National Research Mentoring Network (NRMN) is a strategic partnership whose goals include remedying documented disparities by race and ethnicity in the awarding of National Institutes of Health research grants. Our objectives were to offer a profile of early-career investigators who applied to NRMN’s Grantsmanship Coaching Programs (GCP) and test for differences in the research productivity, professional obligations, research resources, and motivations of applicants from underrepresented groups (URGs) compared with applicants from well-represented groups (WRGs). We also evaluated how employment at a minority serving institution (MSI) influenced access to research resources and professional obligations. Participants: 880 investigators who submitted online applications to join an NRMN GCP between August 1, 2015 and February 1, 2018. Methods: We used two-sample tests of proportions and logistic regression to explore differences in applicants’ characteristics and local research environment by group (URG vs WRG) and institution type (MSI vs Other). Results: URG and WRG applicants did not differ in grant application submission history. However, URG applicants had published fewer articles than WRG peers (9.8 vs 15.3, P<.001) and fewer articles as first/last author (4.4 vs 6.9, P<.001). URG applicants reported less access to core facilities to conduct research (74% vs 81%, P<.05). Investigators at MSIs reported less access to collaborators (P<.01) and departmental colleagues with federal funding (P<.001) and spent less time on conducting research (P<.001). URGs were more motivated to seek professional development support to expand their peer networks (P<.05) and advance their careers (P<.001). Conclusions: Our findings identified several points of intervention to help applicants from URGs to improve their future chances of obtaining competitive funding.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)123-128
Number of pages6
JournalEthnicity & disease
Volume29
Issue numberSuppl 1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2019

Fingerprint

Biomedical Research
Research Personnel
Research
Organized Financing
Peer Group
Minority Groups
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Motivation
Logistic Models
History
Mentoring

Keywords

  • Diversity
  • Minority Faculty Groups
  • Professional Development
  • Research Grants
  • Research Resources

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Cite this

Exploring Professional Development for New Investigators Underrepresented in the Federally Funded Biomedical Research Workforce. / Hemming, Japera; Eide, Kristin; Harwood, Eileen; Ali, Ratib; Zhu, Zhu; Cutler, Jason; Buchwald, Dedra S.; Engler, Jeffrey; Jones, Harlan P.; Manson, Spero M.; McGee, Richard; Okuyemi, Kolawole S.; Ofili, Elizabeth; Schwartz, Nancy; Steer, Clifford; Weber-Main, Anne Marie; Vishwanatha, Jamboor K.

In: Ethnicity & disease, Vol. 29, No. Suppl 1, 02.2019, p. 123-128.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hemming, J, Eide, K, Harwood, E, Ali, R, Zhu, Z, Cutler, J, Buchwald, DS, Engler, J, Jones, HP, Manson, SM, McGee, R, Okuyemi, KS, Ofili, E, Schwartz, N, Steer, C, Weber-Main, AM & Vishwanatha, JK 2019, 'Exploring Professional Development for New Investigators Underrepresented in the Federally Funded Biomedical Research Workforce', Ethnicity & disease, vol. 29, no. Suppl 1, pp. 123-128. https://doi.org/10.18865/ed.29.S1.123, https://doi.org/10.18865/ed.29.S1.123
Hemming, Japera ; Eide, Kristin ; Harwood, Eileen ; Ali, Ratib ; Zhu, Zhu ; Cutler, Jason ; Buchwald, Dedra S. ; Engler, Jeffrey ; Jones, Harlan P. ; Manson, Spero M. ; McGee, Richard ; Okuyemi, Kolawole S. ; Ofili, Elizabeth ; Schwartz, Nancy ; Steer, Clifford ; Weber-Main, Anne Marie ; Vishwanatha, Jamboor K. / Exploring Professional Development for New Investigators Underrepresented in the Federally Funded Biomedical Research Workforce. In: Ethnicity & disease. 2019 ; Vol. 29, No. Suppl 1. pp. 123-128.
@article{db0954a8d3264427b03b1176cc97cf8d,
title = "Exploring Professional Development for New Investigators Underrepresented in the Federally Funded Biomedical Research Workforce",
abstract = "Objective: The National Research Mentoring Network (NRMN) is a strategic partnership whose goals include remedying documented disparities by race and ethnicity in the awarding of National Institutes of Health research grants. Our objectives were to offer a profile of early-career investigators who applied to NRMN’s Grantsmanship Coaching Programs (GCP) and test for differences in the research productivity, professional obligations, research resources, and motivations of applicants from underrepresented groups (URGs) compared with applicants from well-represented groups (WRGs). We also evaluated how employment at a minority serving institution (MSI) influenced access to research resources and professional obligations. Participants: 880 investigators who submitted online applications to join an NRMN GCP between August 1, 2015 and February 1, 2018. Methods: We used two-sample tests of proportions and logistic regression to explore differences in applicants’ characteristics and local research environment by group (URG vs WRG) and institution type (MSI vs Other). Results: URG and WRG applicants did not differ in grant application submission history. However, URG applicants had published fewer articles than WRG peers (9.8 vs 15.3, P<.001) and fewer articles as first/last author (4.4 vs 6.9, P<.001). URG applicants reported less access to core facilities to conduct research (74{\%} vs 81{\%}, P<.05). Investigators at MSIs reported less access to collaborators (P<.01) and departmental colleagues with federal funding (P<.001) and spent less time on conducting research (P<.001). URGs were more motivated to seek professional development support to expand their peer networks (P<.05) and advance their careers (P<.001). Conclusions: Our findings identified several points of intervention to help applicants from URGs to improve their future chances of obtaining competitive funding.",
keywords = "Diversity, Minority Faculty Groups, Professional Development, Research Grants, Research Resources",
author = "Japera Hemming and Kristin Eide and Eileen Harwood and Ratib Ali and Zhu Zhu and Jason Cutler and Buchwald, {Dedra S.} and Jeffrey Engler and Jones, {Harlan P.} and Manson, {Spero M.} and Richard McGee and Okuyemi, {Kolawole S.} and Elizabeth Ofili and Nancy Schwartz and Clifford Steer and Weber-Main, {Anne Marie} and Vishwanatha, {Jamboor K.}",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
doi = "10.18865/ed.29.S1.123",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "123--128",
journal = "Ethnicity and Disease",
issn = "1049-510X",
publisher = "ISHIB",
number = "Suppl 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring Professional Development for New Investigators Underrepresented in the Federally Funded Biomedical Research Workforce

AU - Hemming, Japera

AU - Eide, Kristin

AU - Harwood, Eileen

AU - Ali, Ratib

AU - Zhu, Zhu

AU - Cutler, Jason

AU - Buchwald, Dedra S.

AU - Engler, Jeffrey

AU - Jones, Harlan P.

AU - Manson, Spero M.

AU - McGee, Richard

AU - Okuyemi, Kolawole S.

AU - Ofili, Elizabeth

AU - Schwartz, Nancy

AU - Steer, Clifford

AU - Weber-Main, Anne Marie

AU - Vishwanatha, Jamboor K.

PY - 2019/2

Y1 - 2019/2

N2 - Objective: The National Research Mentoring Network (NRMN) is a strategic partnership whose goals include remedying documented disparities by race and ethnicity in the awarding of National Institutes of Health research grants. Our objectives were to offer a profile of early-career investigators who applied to NRMN’s Grantsmanship Coaching Programs (GCP) and test for differences in the research productivity, professional obligations, research resources, and motivations of applicants from underrepresented groups (URGs) compared with applicants from well-represented groups (WRGs). We also evaluated how employment at a minority serving institution (MSI) influenced access to research resources and professional obligations. Participants: 880 investigators who submitted online applications to join an NRMN GCP between August 1, 2015 and February 1, 2018. Methods: We used two-sample tests of proportions and logistic regression to explore differences in applicants’ characteristics and local research environment by group (URG vs WRG) and institution type (MSI vs Other). Results: URG and WRG applicants did not differ in grant application submission history. However, URG applicants had published fewer articles than WRG peers (9.8 vs 15.3, P<.001) and fewer articles as first/last author (4.4 vs 6.9, P<.001). URG applicants reported less access to core facilities to conduct research (74% vs 81%, P<.05). Investigators at MSIs reported less access to collaborators (P<.01) and departmental colleagues with federal funding (P<.001) and spent less time on conducting research (P<.001). URGs were more motivated to seek professional development support to expand their peer networks (P<.05) and advance their careers (P<.001). Conclusions: Our findings identified several points of intervention to help applicants from URGs to improve their future chances of obtaining competitive funding.

AB - Objective: The National Research Mentoring Network (NRMN) is a strategic partnership whose goals include remedying documented disparities by race and ethnicity in the awarding of National Institutes of Health research grants. Our objectives were to offer a profile of early-career investigators who applied to NRMN’s Grantsmanship Coaching Programs (GCP) and test for differences in the research productivity, professional obligations, research resources, and motivations of applicants from underrepresented groups (URGs) compared with applicants from well-represented groups (WRGs). We also evaluated how employment at a minority serving institution (MSI) influenced access to research resources and professional obligations. Participants: 880 investigators who submitted online applications to join an NRMN GCP between August 1, 2015 and February 1, 2018. Methods: We used two-sample tests of proportions and logistic regression to explore differences in applicants’ characteristics and local research environment by group (URG vs WRG) and institution type (MSI vs Other). Results: URG and WRG applicants did not differ in grant application submission history. However, URG applicants had published fewer articles than WRG peers (9.8 vs 15.3, P<.001) and fewer articles as first/last author (4.4 vs 6.9, P<.001). URG applicants reported less access to core facilities to conduct research (74% vs 81%, P<.05). Investigators at MSIs reported less access to collaborators (P<.01) and departmental colleagues with federal funding (P<.001) and spent less time on conducting research (P<.001). URGs were more motivated to seek professional development support to expand their peer networks (P<.05) and advance their careers (P<.001). Conclusions: Our findings identified several points of intervention to help applicants from URGs to improve their future chances of obtaining competitive funding.

KW - Diversity

KW - Minority Faculty Groups

KW - Professional Development

KW - Research Grants

KW - Research Resources

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063713598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063713598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.18865/ed.29.S1.123

DO - 10.18865/ed.29.S1.123

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 123

EP - 128

JO - Ethnicity and Disease

JF - Ethnicity and Disease

SN - 1049-510X

IS - Suppl 1

ER -