Abstract
Background: After the implementation of the 2018 US heart transplant allocation system, the experience and perceptions of heart transplant clinicians have not been well-cataloged. Methods and Results: This web-based survey of both heart failure cardiologists and surgeons examined physician perspectives about the policy changes and whether the system is meeting its intended goals. The majority of participants (94%, n = 113) responded that the 2018 heart allocation system requires modification. Eighty-four percent reported using more temporary mechanical circulatory support to achieve higher status and 86% were concerned about the change in physician behavior and practices under the new system. Conclusions: Suggestions for possible improvement included higher status for patients on durable left ventricular assist device support, changes to criteria for status 2, modification of status exceptions, and advocacy for a heart allocation score.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 670-674 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Journal of cardiac failure |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2021 Elsevier Inc.
Keywords
- Heart transplantation
- mechanical circulatory support
- organ allocation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring Physician Perceptions of the 2018 United States Heart Transplant Allocation System'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS