Explaining transit expenses in US urbanised areas: Urban scale, spatial form and fiscal capacity

Jerry Zhirong Zhao, Shengnan Lou, Camila Fonseca, Richard Feiock, Ruowen Shen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This research seeks to explain patterns of capital investment and operating expenses for urban transit systems in the United States. We isolate supply factors including urban scales, urban spatial form and financial capacity. Individual and group transit demands are accounted for by social and demographic characteristics including education level, immigrant populations, poverty levels, senior population and race. The results demonstrate that transit investments are super-linear to population, directly contradicting predictions of Bettencourt’s popular urban scale theory. Transit expenses are explained primarily by urban scales, urban spatial form and financial capacity, but demand forces such as poverty, car usage and political ideology have strong effects as well.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)280-296
Number of pages17
JournalUrban Studies
Volume58
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 23 2020

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by NSF SRN: Integrated Urban Infrastructure Solutions for Environmentally Sustainable, Healthy and Livable Cities, Award Number: 1444745.

Keywords

  • financial capacity
  • political market
  • spatial form
  • transit expenses
  • urban transit

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Explaining transit expenses in US urbanised areas: Urban scale, spatial form and fiscal capacity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this