Abstract
In order to initiate the actionable science needed to support effective conservation under climate change, we engaged researchers and other experts in refining and prioritizing a climate adaptation research agenda that was originally developed via dialogue with natural resource managers. Experts identified topics that were missing or underrepresented in an initial practitioner-defined list of science topics, and then scored topics according to the state of knowledge, the feasibility of research, and the potential that research might change management. Our process capitalizes on the complementarity between the expertise of practitioners and the expertise of researchers and other non-practitioners, improves the transparency and legitimacy of the agenda-setting process, and reveals the challenges public agencies have in focusing on some research topics.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Article number | e13227 |
Journal | Conservation Science and Practice |
Volume | 6 |
Issue number | 10 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 The Author(s). Conservation Science and Practice published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.
Keywords
- academic-government partnerships
- actionable science
- climate change adaptation
- research agenda