TY - JOUR
T1 - Expert consensus on training and accreditation for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation an international, multidisciplinary modified Delphi Study
AU - Kruit, Natalie
AU - Burrell, Aidan
AU - Tian, David
AU - Barrett, Nicholas
AU - Bělohlávek, Jan
AU - Bernard, Stephen
AU - Braude, Darren
AU - Buscher, Hergen
AU - Chen, Yih Sharng
AU - Donker, Dirk W.
AU - Finney, Simon
AU - Forrest, Paul
AU - Fowles, Jo anne
AU - Hifumi, Toru
AU - Hodgson, Carol
AU - Hutin, Alice
AU - Inoue, Akihiko
AU - Jung, Jae Seung
AU - Kruse, J. M.
AU - Lamhaut, Lionel
AU - Ming-Hui Lin, Richard
AU - Reis Miranda, Dinis
AU - Müller, Thomas
AU - Bhagyalakshmi Nanjayya, Vinodh
AU - Nickson, Christopher
AU - Pellegrino, Vin
AU - Plunkett, Brian
AU - Richardson, Carla
AU - Alexander Richardson, Sacha
AU - Shekar, Kiran
AU - Shinar, Zachary
AU - Singer, Ben
AU - Stub, Dion
AU - Totaro, Richard J.
AU - Vuylsteke, Alain
AU - Yannopoulos, Demetris
AU - Zakhary, Bishoy
AU - Dennis, Mark
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2023/11
Y1 - 2023/11
N2 - Background: A multidisciplinary group of stakeholders were used to identify: (1) the core competencies of a training program required to perform in-hospital ECPR initiation (2) additional competencies required to perform pre-hospital ECPR initiation and; (3) the optimal training method and maintenance protocol for delivering an ECPR program. Methods: A modified Delphi process was undertaken utilising two web based survey rounds and one virtual meeting. Experts rated the importance of different aspects of ECPR training, competency and governance on a 9-point Likert scale. A diverse, representative group was targeted. Consensus was achieved when greater than 70% respondents rated a domain as critical (> or = 7 on the 9 point Likert scale). Results: 35 international ECPR experts from 9 countries formed the expert panel, with a median number of 14 years of ECMO practice (interquartile range 11–38). Participant response rates were 97% (survey round one), 63% (virtual meeting) and 100% (survey round two). After the second round of the survey, 47 consensus statements were formed outlining a core set of competencies required for ECPR provision. We identified key elements required to safely train and perform ECPR including skill pre-requisites, surrogate skill identification, the importance of competency-based assessment over volume of practice and competency requirements for successful ECPR practice and skill maintenance. Conclusions: We present a series of core competencies, training requirements and ongoing governance protocols to guide safe ECPR implementation. These findings can be used to develop training syllabus and guide minimum standards for competency as the growth of ECPR practitioners continues.
AB - Background: A multidisciplinary group of stakeholders were used to identify: (1) the core competencies of a training program required to perform in-hospital ECPR initiation (2) additional competencies required to perform pre-hospital ECPR initiation and; (3) the optimal training method and maintenance protocol for delivering an ECPR program. Methods: A modified Delphi process was undertaken utilising two web based survey rounds and one virtual meeting. Experts rated the importance of different aspects of ECPR training, competency and governance on a 9-point Likert scale. A diverse, representative group was targeted. Consensus was achieved when greater than 70% respondents rated a domain as critical (> or = 7 on the 9 point Likert scale). Results: 35 international ECPR experts from 9 countries formed the expert panel, with a median number of 14 years of ECMO practice (interquartile range 11–38). Participant response rates were 97% (survey round one), 63% (virtual meeting) and 100% (survey round two). After the second round of the survey, 47 consensus statements were formed outlining a core set of competencies required for ECPR provision. We identified key elements required to safely train and perform ECPR including skill pre-requisites, surrogate skill identification, the importance of competency-based assessment over volume of practice and competency requirements for successful ECPR practice and skill maintenance. Conclusions: We present a series of core competencies, training requirements and ongoing governance protocols to guide safe ECPR implementation. These findings can be used to develop training syllabus and guide minimum standards for competency as the growth of ECPR practitioners continues.
KW - Advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation
KW - Extracorporeal life support (ECLS)
KW - Pre-hospital, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR)
KW - Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85174203324&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85174203324&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109989
DO - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109989
M3 - Article
C2 - 37805061
AN - SCOPUS:85174203324
SN - 0300-9572
VL - 192
JO - Resuscitation
JF - Resuscitation
M1 - 109989
ER -