Abstract
Theory and empirical work suggest that teachers’ social capital influences school improvement efforts. Social ties are prerequisite for social capital, yet little causal evidence exists on how malleable factors, such as instructional management approaches, affect teachers’ ties. In this cluster-randomized trial, we apply a decision-making perspective to compare a literacy intervention managed under a “fidelity-focused” approach, in which teachers were expected to implement researcher-designed procedures faithfully, versus a “structured adaptive” approach, in which teachers collaboratively planned program adaptations. In the short term, the adaptive approach increased teachers’ accessing of intervention-related social capital, but decreased their accessing of social capital unrelated to the intervention. Short-term effects varied based on participants’ role in the intervention. No group differences were found on social capital measures one year later, suggesting that the structured adaptive approach did not make teachers more likely to form ties that would be useful outside of the intervention.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 196-218 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis |
Volume | 40 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 1 2018 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was made possible by an Investing in Innovation Fund (i3) Grant from the U.S. Department of Education (PR/ Award No. U396B100195). David Quinn received support from the Dean’s Summer Fellowship at the Harvard Graduate School of Education.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, © 2017 AERA.
Keywords
- adaptive implementation
- cluster-randomized trial
- fidelity of implementation
- social capital
- social network analysis
- teacher networks