TY - JOUR
T1 - Experimental and computational study of pulsatile flow characteristics in Romanesque and gothic aortic arch models
AU - Zhang, Yan
AU - Zhang, Ruihang
AU - Thomas, Nick
AU - Ullah, Al Habib
AU - Eichholz, Benjamin
AU - Estevadeordal, Jordi
AU - Suzen, Yildirim Bora
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022
PY - 2022/4
Y1 - 2022/4
N2 - Romanesque and Gothic are two types of deformed aortic arch geometries after surgical repair of coarctation of the aorta. The abnormal arch geometry and hemodynamics are associated with late systemic hypertension, aortic aneurysms, and other cardiovascular complications. To understand the fluid dynamic signatures of such flow, a combined experimental and computational fluid dynamic (CFD) study has been conducted to quantitatively compare the main (axial) and secondary flow characteristics. In the experiments, a pulsatile flow simulator was used to generate the pulsatile flow conditions. Phase-locked planar and tomographic particle image velocimetry techniques were employed to quantitatively study the flow fields. Three-dimensional CFD simulations were also performed and compared with the experimental data. The results show that in the Romanesque arch, the flow first accelerates along the inner wall and then becomes more uniform in the cross-section after the peak systole. A pair of wall vortices and Dean-type vortices develop during the systolic phase. The coherent structures are continuously extended into the descending aorta and persist throughout the cycle. In comparison, the Gothic arch exhibits a highly skewed velocity distribution with high velocity around the arch apex. The sharp curvature causes flow separation, jet impingement, and stagnant flow near the top. The coherent structures in the Gothic arch are less continuous in the descending aorta, which also differ from those observed in the Romanesque model. The distinct flow characteristics of the Gothic arch lead to more temporal and spatial variations of wall shear stress in the descending aorta, implying hemodynamic risks for aortic complications.
AB - Romanesque and Gothic are two types of deformed aortic arch geometries after surgical repair of coarctation of the aorta. The abnormal arch geometry and hemodynamics are associated with late systemic hypertension, aortic aneurysms, and other cardiovascular complications. To understand the fluid dynamic signatures of such flow, a combined experimental and computational fluid dynamic (CFD) study has been conducted to quantitatively compare the main (axial) and secondary flow characteristics. In the experiments, a pulsatile flow simulator was used to generate the pulsatile flow conditions. Phase-locked planar and tomographic particle image velocimetry techniques were employed to quantitatively study the flow fields. Three-dimensional CFD simulations were also performed and compared with the experimental data. The results show that in the Romanesque arch, the flow first accelerates along the inner wall and then becomes more uniform in the cross-section after the peak systole. A pair of wall vortices and Dean-type vortices develop during the systolic phase. The coherent structures are continuously extended into the descending aorta and persist throughout the cycle. In comparison, the Gothic arch exhibits a highly skewed velocity distribution with high velocity around the arch apex. The sharp curvature causes flow separation, jet impingement, and stagnant flow near the top. The coherent structures in the Gothic arch are less continuous in the descending aorta, which also differ from those observed in the Romanesque model. The distinct flow characteristics of the Gothic arch lead to more temporal and spatial variations of wall shear stress in the descending aorta, implying hemodynamic risks for aortic complications.
KW - Aortic arch
KW - Computational fluid dynamics
KW - Gothic
KW - Particle image velocimetry
KW - Pulsatile flow
KW - Romanesque
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125622237&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85125622237&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.medengphy.2022.103784
DO - 10.1016/j.medengphy.2022.103784
M3 - Article
C2 - 35346437
AN - SCOPUS:85125622237
SN - 1350-4533
VL - 102
JO - Medical Engineering and Physics
JF - Medical Engineering and Physics
M1 - 103784
ER -