Executive function and children's understanding of false belief: How specific is the relation?

Ulrich Müller, Philip David Zelazo, Sarah Imrisek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

81 Scopus citations

Abstract

The present study examined developmental relations among understanding false belief, understanding "false" photographs, performance on the Dimensional Change Card Sort (DCCS), and performance on a picture-sentence verification task in 69 3-5-year-old children. Results showed that performance on the DCCS predicted performance on false belief questions even after controlling for children's age and verbal ability. However, neither performance on the picture-sentence verification task, nor performance on the "false" photograph task predicted false belief understanding. Implications of these findings are discussed in the context of suggestions that understanding false belief reflects a general understanding of representation, propositional negation, and the ability to use higher order rules.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)173-189
Number of pages17
JournalCognitive Development
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2005

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This research was supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada to P.D. Zelazo.

Keywords

  • False belief
  • Performance
  • Photograph

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Executive function and children's understanding of false belief: How specific is the relation?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this