Examining the stability of social, emotional, and behavioral risk status

Implications for screening frequency

Faith G Miller, Sandra M. Chafouleas, Megan E. Welsh, T. Chris Riley-Tillman, Gregory A. Fabiano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Responsive service delivery frameworks rely on the use of screening approaches to identify students in need of support and to guide subsequent assessment and intervention efforts. However, limited empirical investigations have been directed to informing how often screening should occur for social, emotional, and behavioral difficulties in school settings. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the stability of risk status on 3 different screening instruments across 3 administrations across the course of a school year. A total of 1,594 students had complete screening data across 3 time points, corresponding to a total of 187 teachers from 22 different public schools located within the northeastern and midwestern United States. Across measures, we examined patterns of risk across time points and investigated the utility of (a) different screening schedules (fall, winter, and spring) and (b) borderline screening when conducting multiple screenings per year. Results indicated that a large proportion of students exhibited stable risk patterns across time points and suggested that borderline screening may be a viable alternative for schools with limited resources. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)43-53
Number of pages11
JournalSchool Psychology Quarterly
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Students
school
Midwestern United States
New England
student
Appointments and Schedules
teacher
resources
time

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Behavior
  • Screening

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Cite this

Examining the stability of social, emotional, and behavioral risk status : Implications for screening frequency. / Miller, Faith G; Chafouleas, Sandra M.; Welsh, Megan E.; Riley-Tillman, T. Chris; Fabiano, Gregory A.

In: School Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 43-53.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Miller, Faith G ; Chafouleas, Sandra M. ; Welsh, Megan E. ; Riley-Tillman, T. Chris ; Fabiano, Gregory A. / Examining the stability of social, emotional, and behavioral risk status : Implications for screening frequency. In: School Psychology Quarterly. 2019 ; Vol. 34, No. 1. pp. 43-53.
@article{6ded4766157c4b97bf5cdf3de1542262,
title = "Examining the stability of social, emotional, and behavioral risk status: Implications for screening frequency",
abstract = "Responsive service delivery frameworks rely on the use of screening approaches to identify students in need of support and to guide subsequent assessment and intervention efforts. However, limited empirical investigations have been directed to informing how often screening should occur for social, emotional, and behavioral difficulties in school settings. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the stability of risk status on 3 different screening instruments across 3 administrations across the course of a school year. A total of 1,594 students had complete screening data across 3 time points, corresponding to a total of 187 teachers from 22 different public schools located within the northeastern and midwestern United States. Across measures, we examined patterns of risk across time points and investigated the utility of (a) different screening schedules (fall, winter, and spring) and (b) borderline screening when conducting multiple screenings per year. Results indicated that a large proportion of students exhibited stable risk patterns across time points and suggested that borderline screening may be a viable alternative for schools with limited resources. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.",
keywords = "Assessment, Behavior, Screening",
author = "Miller, {Faith G} and Chafouleas, {Sandra M.} and Welsh, {Megan E.} and Riley-Tillman, {T. Chris} and Fabiano, {Gregory A.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/spq0000252",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "43--53",
journal = "School Psychology Quarterly",
issn = "1045-3830",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examining the stability of social, emotional, and behavioral risk status

T2 - Implications for screening frequency

AU - Miller, Faith G

AU - Chafouleas, Sandra M.

AU - Welsh, Megan E.

AU - Riley-Tillman, T. Chris

AU - Fabiano, Gregory A.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Responsive service delivery frameworks rely on the use of screening approaches to identify students in need of support and to guide subsequent assessment and intervention efforts. However, limited empirical investigations have been directed to informing how often screening should occur for social, emotional, and behavioral difficulties in school settings. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the stability of risk status on 3 different screening instruments across 3 administrations across the course of a school year. A total of 1,594 students had complete screening data across 3 time points, corresponding to a total of 187 teachers from 22 different public schools located within the northeastern and midwestern United States. Across measures, we examined patterns of risk across time points and investigated the utility of (a) different screening schedules (fall, winter, and spring) and (b) borderline screening when conducting multiple screenings per year. Results indicated that a large proportion of students exhibited stable risk patterns across time points and suggested that borderline screening may be a viable alternative for schools with limited resources. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.

AB - Responsive service delivery frameworks rely on the use of screening approaches to identify students in need of support and to guide subsequent assessment and intervention efforts. However, limited empirical investigations have been directed to informing how often screening should occur for social, emotional, and behavioral difficulties in school settings. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the stability of risk status on 3 different screening instruments across 3 administrations across the course of a school year. A total of 1,594 students had complete screening data across 3 time points, corresponding to a total of 187 teachers from 22 different public schools located within the northeastern and midwestern United States. Across measures, we examined patterns of risk across time points and investigated the utility of (a) different screening schedules (fall, winter, and spring) and (b) borderline screening when conducting multiple screenings per year. Results indicated that a large proportion of students exhibited stable risk patterns across time points and suggested that borderline screening may be a viable alternative for schools with limited resources. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.

KW - Assessment

KW - Behavior

KW - Screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047348748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047348748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/spq0000252

DO - 10.1037/spq0000252

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 43

EP - 53

JO - School Psychology Quarterly

JF - School Psychology Quarterly

SN - 1045-3830

IS - 1

ER -