TY - JOUR
T1 - Examining the effects of grade retention on student reading performance
T2 - A longitudinal study
AU - Silberglitt, Benjamin
AU - Appleton, James J.
AU - Burns, Matthew K.
AU - Jimerson, Shane R.
PY - 2006/9
Y1 - 2006/9
N2 - Grade retention is an intervention that has received increasing scrutiny as policies, practices, and results of research diverge. This longitudinal study examines the reading growth trajectories of students (n = 147) from first- through eighth-grade. Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM) analytic procedures provide unique insights regarding the relative reading growth curves among retained students, similarly achieving but promoted students, and a random sample of students. The results revealed that retained students did not experience a benefit in their growth rate (relative to either the preceding year, or to similarly performing but promoted students), and made less progress compared to the randomly selected group of students. While consistent with the extant empirical evidence failing to support the effectiveness of grade retention, these findings warrant careful consideration given both the longitudinal design and the analytic procedures.
AB - Grade retention is an intervention that has received increasing scrutiny as policies, practices, and results of research diverge. This longitudinal study examines the reading growth trajectories of students (n = 147) from first- through eighth-grade. Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM) analytic procedures provide unique insights regarding the relative reading growth curves among retained students, similarly achieving but promoted students, and a random sample of students. The results revealed that retained students did not experience a benefit in their growth rate (relative to either the preceding year, or to similarly performing but promoted students), and made less progress compared to the randomly selected group of students. While consistent with the extant empirical evidence failing to support the effectiveness of grade retention, these findings warrant careful consideration given both the longitudinal design and the analytic procedures.
KW - Longitudinal
KW - Reading growth
KW - Retention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746347362&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746347362&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jsp.2006.05.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jsp.2006.05.004
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:33746347362
SN - 0022-4405
VL - 44
SP - 255
EP - 270
JO - Journal of school psychology
JF - Journal of school psychology
IS - 4
ER -