TY - JOUR
T1 - Examining inequality in aquatic ecosystem services
T2 - Evidence from large-scale monitoring programs
AU - Kovalenko, Katya E.
AU - Ilyushkin, Sergey
AU - Wellard Kelly, Holly A
AU - Neville, Justine A.
AU - Guntenspergen, Glenn R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2024/7/20
Y1 - 2024/7/20
N2 - We hypothesize that aquatic ecosystem services are likely to be inequitably accessible and addressing this hypothesis requires systematic assessment at regional and national scales. We used existing data from large-scale aquatic monitoring programs (National Coastal Condition Assessment, National Lakes Assessment) to examine relationships between ecosystem condition, approximating a subset of cultural and provisioning services, and inequality (population below poverty level, minority population). We also assessed whether monitoring sites equitably represented the gradient of socioeconomic backgrounds. Several water quality indicators were associated with significantly different minority and low-income percentages; however, the effect size was generally small, with the exception of nitrogen condition status. Minority communities were somewhat under-represented when comparing the distribution of all census blocks to those in proximity to monitoring sites. Analyses were sensitive to the skewed distribution of monitoring sites with a low frequency of observations at the more socially vulnerable part of the gradient. We discuss implications of these findings for improving the representation of vulnerable communities in large-scale monitoring programs.
AB - We hypothesize that aquatic ecosystem services are likely to be inequitably accessible and addressing this hypothesis requires systematic assessment at regional and national scales. We used existing data from large-scale aquatic monitoring programs (National Coastal Condition Assessment, National Lakes Assessment) to examine relationships between ecosystem condition, approximating a subset of cultural and provisioning services, and inequality (population below poverty level, minority population). We also assessed whether monitoring sites equitably represented the gradient of socioeconomic backgrounds. Several water quality indicators were associated with significantly different minority and low-income percentages; however, the effect size was generally small, with the exception of nitrogen condition status. Minority communities were somewhat under-represented when comparing the distribution of all census blocks to those in proximity to monitoring sites. Analyses were sensitive to the skewed distribution of monitoring sites with a low frequency of observations at the more socially vulnerable part of the gradient. We discuss implications of these findings for improving the representation of vulnerable communities in large-scale monitoring programs.
KW - Aquatic ecosystem services
KW - Environmental justice
KW - Nutrient pollution
KW - Representation in monitoring
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85193905328&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85193905328&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173365
DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173365
M3 - Article
C2 - 38777066
AN - SCOPUS:85193905328
SN - 0048-9697
VL - 935
JO - Science of the Total Environment
JF - Science of the Total Environment
M1 - 173365
ER -