Examining DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling: Psychometric properties and evidence from cognitive biases

Chad E. Lakey, Adam S. Goodie, Charles E. Lance, Randy D Stinchfield, Ken C Winters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Scopus citations


We examined the DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling as assessed with the DSM-IV-based Diagnostic Interview for Gambling Severity (DIGS; Winters, Specker, & Stinchfield, 2002). We first analyzed the psychometric properties of the DIGS, and then assessed the extent to which performance on two judgment and decision-making tasks, the Georgia Gambling Task (Goodie, 2003) and the Iowa Gambling Task (Bechara, Damasio, Damasio, & Anderson, 1994), related to higher reports of gambling pathology. In a sample of frequent gamblers, we found strong psychometric support for the DSM-IV conception of pathological gambling as measured by the DIGS, predictive relationships between DIGS scores and all cognitive performance measures, and significant differences in performance measures between individuals with and without pathological gambling. Analyses using suggested revisions to the pathological gambling threshold (Stinchfield, 2003) revealed that individuals meeting four of the DSM-IV criteria aligned significantly more with pathological gamblers than with non-pathological gamblers, supporting the suggested change in the cutoff score from five to four symptoms. Discussion focuses on the validity of the DSM-IV criteria as assessed by the DIGS and the role of cognitive biases in pathological gambling.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)479-498
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of gambling studies
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 1 2007


  • DSM-IV criteria
  • Georgia Gambling Task
  • Iowa Gambling Task
  • Overconfidence
  • Pathological gambling

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Examining DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling: Psychometric properties and evidence from cognitive biases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this