TY - JOUR
T1 - Examining Alphabet Writing Fluency in Kindergarten
T2 - Exploring the Issue of Time on Task
AU - Reinke, Wendy M.
AU - Herman, Keith C.
AU - Puranik, Cynthia S.
AU - Patchan, Melissa M.
AU - Sears, Mary M.
AU - McMaster, Kristen L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2016.
PY - 2017/3/1
Y1 - 2017/3/1
N2 - Curriculum-based measures (CBMs) are necessary for educators to quickly assess student skill levels and monitor progress. This study examined the use of the alphabet writing fluency task, a CBM of writing, to assess handwriting fluency - that is, how well children access, retrieve, and write letter forms automatically. In the current study, the alphabet writing fluency task was administered at both the beginning and end of the kindergarten school year. Scores were calculated for two time increments, 15 and 60 s, and compared with an alphabet writing, untimed task. All three scores were compared with criterion measures of writing, including both standardized writing assessments and compositional CBMs of writing. Results indicate that measuring alphabet writing fluency using either timed tasks (15- or 60-s) at the beginning or the end of kindergarten may not be a useful or valid endeavor. In contrast, the alphabet writing, untimed task measure showed stronger correlations to criterion writing measures in comparison with the 15- and 60-s alphabet writing fluency tasks and also showed greater concurrent and predictive validity. Limitations and further areas of study are discussed.
AB - Curriculum-based measures (CBMs) are necessary for educators to quickly assess student skill levels and monitor progress. This study examined the use of the alphabet writing fluency task, a CBM of writing, to assess handwriting fluency - that is, how well children access, retrieve, and write letter forms automatically. In the current study, the alphabet writing fluency task was administered at both the beginning and end of the kindergarten school year. Scores were calculated for two time increments, 15 and 60 s, and compared with an alphabet writing, untimed task. All three scores were compared with criterion measures of writing, including both standardized writing assessments and compositional CBMs of writing. Results indicate that measuring alphabet writing fluency using either timed tasks (15- or 60-s) at the beginning or the end of kindergarten may not be a useful or valid endeavor. In contrast, the alphabet writing, untimed task measure showed stronger correlations to criterion writing measures in comparison with the 15- and 60-s alphabet writing fluency tasks and also showed greater concurrent and predictive validity. Limitations and further areas of study are discussed.
KW - alphabet writing fluency
KW - curriculum-based measures
KW - emergent literacy
KW - handwriting fluency
KW - transcription
KW - writing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011864102&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011864102&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1534508416665324
DO - 10.1177/1534508416665324
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85011864102
SN - 1534-5084
VL - 42
SP - 81
EP - 96
JO - Assessment for Effective Intervention
JF - Assessment for Effective Intervention
IS - 2
ER -