Evidence within a portfolio-based assessment program: What do medical students select to document their performance?

Elaine F. Dannefer, S. Beth Bierer, Sophia P Gladding

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Decisions about performance in programs of assessment that provide an array of assessment evidence require judgments about the quality of different pieces of assessment data to determine which combination of data points best represent a trainee's overall performance. Aim: In this article, we examine the nature of evidence selected by first-year medical students to include in a portfolio used to make promotion decisions. Methods: We reviewed portfolios to examine the number, type, and source of assessments selected by students (n=32) to document their performance in seven competencies. The quality of assessment data selected for each competency was rated by promotion committee members (n=14). Results: Findings indicate that students cited multiple types and sources of available assessments. The promotion committee rated evidence quality highest for competencies where the program provided sufficient evidence for students to cite a broad range of assessments. When assessments were not provided by the program, students cited self-generated evidence. Conclusion: We found that when student-constructed portfolios are part of an overall assessment system, students generally select evidence in proportion to the number and types of assessments available.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)215-220
Number of pages6
JournalMedical Teacher
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2012

Fingerprint

Medical Students
medical student
Students
performance
evidence
promotion
Committee Membership
student
first-year student
trainee

Cite this

Evidence within a portfolio-based assessment program : What do medical students select to document their performance? / Dannefer, Elaine F.; Bierer, S. Beth; Gladding, Sophia P.

In: Medical Teacher, Vol. 34, No. 3, 01.03.2012, p. 215-220.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0ce209baf68b420fb26ef942a0cf2a4f,
title = "Evidence within a portfolio-based assessment program: What do medical students select to document their performance?",
abstract = "Background: Decisions about performance in programs of assessment that provide an array of assessment evidence require judgments about the quality of different pieces of assessment data to determine which combination of data points best represent a trainee's overall performance. Aim: In this article, we examine the nature of evidence selected by first-year medical students to include in a portfolio used to make promotion decisions. Methods: We reviewed portfolios to examine the number, type, and source of assessments selected by students (n=32) to document their performance in seven competencies. The quality of assessment data selected for each competency was rated by promotion committee members (n=14). Results: Findings indicate that students cited multiple types and sources of available assessments. The promotion committee rated evidence quality highest for competencies where the program provided sufficient evidence for students to cite a broad range of assessments. When assessments were not provided by the program, students cited self-generated evidence. Conclusion: We found that when student-constructed portfolios are part of an overall assessment system, students generally select evidence in proportion to the number and types of assessments available.",
author = "Dannefer, {Elaine F.} and Bierer, {S. Beth} and Gladding, {Sophia P}",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3109/0142159X.2012.652241",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "215--220",
journal = "Medical Teacher",
issn = "0142-159X",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence within a portfolio-based assessment program

T2 - What do medical students select to document their performance?

AU - Dannefer, Elaine F.

AU - Bierer, S. Beth

AU - Gladding, Sophia P

PY - 2012/3/1

Y1 - 2012/3/1

N2 - Background: Decisions about performance in programs of assessment that provide an array of assessment evidence require judgments about the quality of different pieces of assessment data to determine which combination of data points best represent a trainee's overall performance. Aim: In this article, we examine the nature of evidence selected by first-year medical students to include in a portfolio used to make promotion decisions. Methods: We reviewed portfolios to examine the number, type, and source of assessments selected by students (n=32) to document their performance in seven competencies. The quality of assessment data selected for each competency was rated by promotion committee members (n=14). Results: Findings indicate that students cited multiple types and sources of available assessments. The promotion committee rated evidence quality highest for competencies where the program provided sufficient evidence for students to cite a broad range of assessments. When assessments were not provided by the program, students cited self-generated evidence. Conclusion: We found that when student-constructed portfolios are part of an overall assessment system, students generally select evidence in proportion to the number and types of assessments available.

AB - Background: Decisions about performance in programs of assessment that provide an array of assessment evidence require judgments about the quality of different pieces of assessment data to determine which combination of data points best represent a trainee's overall performance. Aim: In this article, we examine the nature of evidence selected by first-year medical students to include in a portfolio used to make promotion decisions. Methods: We reviewed portfolios to examine the number, type, and source of assessments selected by students (n=32) to document their performance in seven competencies. The quality of assessment data selected for each competency was rated by promotion committee members (n=14). Results: Findings indicate that students cited multiple types and sources of available assessments. The promotion committee rated evidence quality highest for competencies where the program provided sufficient evidence for students to cite a broad range of assessments. When assessments were not provided by the program, students cited self-generated evidence. Conclusion: We found that when student-constructed portfolios are part of an overall assessment system, students generally select evidence in proportion to the number and types of assessments available.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857622640&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857622640&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/0142159X.2012.652241

DO - 10.3109/0142159X.2012.652241

M3 - Article

C2 - 22364453

AN - SCOPUS:84857622640

VL - 34

SP - 215

EP - 220

JO - Medical Teacher

JF - Medical Teacher

SN - 0142-159X

IS - 3

ER -