Evidence-based approach to the surgical literature

Philipp D. Dahm, Molly M. Neuberger, Steven E. Canfield

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Evidence-based medicine was one of the most influential ideas of the 20th century and continues to shape the way we practice medicine, as reflected in the increased emphasis on clinical practice guidelines and performance measures. Urologists have been widely supportive of this development and the reluctance that does exist may in large part be attributed to a misinterpretation of its guiding principles. Until recently, few surgeonspecific resources to learn about evidence-based medicine existed. This chapter aims to help close this gap by providing a comprehensive overview of its core concepts as they relate to the clinical practice of urology. To do so, this chapter outlines a framework on how to formulate a focused clinical question, search for the best available evidence, critically appraise the evidence, and finally, apply the evidence in the setting of an individual patient and assess its impact. Particular emphasis is given in this chapter to the role of systematic reviews in clinical practice guidelines to guide clinical decisionmaking. Lastly, this chapter introduces the GRADE framework for rating the quality of evidence that is rapidly becoming the unified standard for systematic reviews and guidance documents.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationEssentials and Updates in Urologic Oncology (2 Volume Set)
PublisherNova Science Publishers, Inc.
Pages19-42
Number of pages24
ISBN (Print)9781620816493
StatePublished - Dec 1 2012

Fingerprint

Evidence-Based Medicine
Practice Guidelines
Medicine
Urology
Urologists

Cite this

Dahm, P. D., Neuberger, M. M., & Canfield, S. E. (2012). Evidence-based approach to the surgical literature. In Essentials and Updates in Urologic Oncology (2 Volume Set) (pp. 19-42). Nova Science Publishers, Inc..

Evidence-based approach to the surgical literature. / Dahm, Philipp D.; Neuberger, Molly M.; Canfield, Steven E.

Essentials and Updates in Urologic Oncology (2 Volume Set). Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2012. p. 19-42.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Dahm, PD, Neuberger, MM & Canfield, SE 2012, Evidence-based approach to the surgical literature. in Essentials and Updates in Urologic Oncology (2 Volume Set). Nova Science Publishers, Inc., pp. 19-42.
Dahm PD, Neuberger MM, Canfield SE. Evidence-based approach to the surgical literature. In Essentials and Updates in Urologic Oncology (2 Volume Set). Nova Science Publishers, Inc. 2012. p. 19-42
Dahm, Philipp D. ; Neuberger, Molly M. ; Canfield, Steven E. / Evidence-based approach to the surgical literature. Essentials and Updates in Urologic Oncology (2 Volume Set). Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2012. pp. 19-42
@inbook{bcda5c54d849457a8da08438325197f9,
title = "Evidence-based approach to the surgical literature",
abstract = "Evidence-based medicine was one of the most influential ideas of the 20th century and continues to shape the way we practice medicine, as reflected in the increased emphasis on clinical practice guidelines and performance measures. Urologists have been widely supportive of this development and the reluctance that does exist may in large part be attributed to a misinterpretation of its guiding principles. Until recently, few surgeonspecific resources to learn about evidence-based medicine existed. This chapter aims to help close this gap by providing a comprehensive overview of its core concepts as they relate to the clinical practice of urology. To do so, this chapter outlines a framework on how to formulate a focused clinical question, search for the best available evidence, critically appraise the evidence, and finally, apply the evidence in the setting of an individual patient and assess its impact. Particular emphasis is given in this chapter to the role of systematic reviews in clinical practice guidelines to guide clinical decisionmaking. Lastly, this chapter introduces the GRADE framework for rating the quality of evidence that is rapidly becoming the unified standard for systematic reviews and guidance documents.",
author = "Dahm, {Philipp D.} and Neuberger, {Molly M.} and Canfield, {Steven E.}",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781620816493",
pages = "19--42",
booktitle = "Essentials and Updates in Urologic Oncology (2 Volume Set)",
publisher = "Nova Science Publishers, Inc.",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Evidence-based approach to the surgical literature

AU - Dahm, Philipp D.

AU - Neuberger, Molly M.

AU - Canfield, Steven E.

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - Evidence-based medicine was one of the most influential ideas of the 20th century and continues to shape the way we practice medicine, as reflected in the increased emphasis on clinical practice guidelines and performance measures. Urologists have been widely supportive of this development and the reluctance that does exist may in large part be attributed to a misinterpretation of its guiding principles. Until recently, few surgeonspecific resources to learn about evidence-based medicine existed. This chapter aims to help close this gap by providing a comprehensive overview of its core concepts as they relate to the clinical practice of urology. To do so, this chapter outlines a framework on how to formulate a focused clinical question, search for the best available evidence, critically appraise the evidence, and finally, apply the evidence in the setting of an individual patient and assess its impact. Particular emphasis is given in this chapter to the role of systematic reviews in clinical practice guidelines to guide clinical decisionmaking. Lastly, this chapter introduces the GRADE framework for rating the quality of evidence that is rapidly becoming the unified standard for systematic reviews and guidance documents.

AB - Evidence-based medicine was one of the most influential ideas of the 20th century and continues to shape the way we practice medicine, as reflected in the increased emphasis on clinical practice guidelines and performance measures. Urologists have been widely supportive of this development and the reluctance that does exist may in large part be attributed to a misinterpretation of its guiding principles. Until recently, few surgeonspecific resources to learn about evidence-based medicine existed. This chapter aims to help close this gap by providing a comprehensive overview of its core concepts as they relate to the clinical practice of urology. To do so, this chapter outlines a framework on how to formulate a focused clinical question, search for the best available evidence, critically appraise the evidence, and finally, apply the evidence in the setting of an individual patient and assess its impact. Particular emphasis is given in this chapter to the role of systematic reviews in clinical practice guidelines to guide clinical decisionmaking. Lastly, this chapter introduces the GRADE framework for rating the quality of evidence that is rapidly becoming the unified standard for systematic reviews and guidance documents.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84895409055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84895409055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84895409055

SN - 9781620816493

SP - 19

EP - 42

BT - Essentials and Updates in Urologic Oncology (2 Volume Set)

PB - Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

ER -