Everyone counts? Design considerations in online citizen science

Helen Spiers, Alexandra Swanson, Lucy F Fortson, Brooke D. Simmons, Laura Trouille, Samantha Blickhan, Chris Lintott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Effective classification of large datasets is a ubiquitous challenge across multiple knowledge domains. One solution gaining in popularity is to perform distributed data analysis via online citizen science platforms, such as the Zooniverse. The resulting growth in project numbers is increasing the need to improve understanding of the volunteer experience; as the sustainability of citizen science is dependent on our ability to design for engagement and usability. Here, we examine volunteer interaction with 63 projects, representing the most comprehensive collection of online citizen science project data gathered to date. Together, this analysis demonstrates how subtle project design changes can influence many facets of volunteer interaction, including when and how much volunteers interact, and, importantly, who participates. Our findings highlight the tension between designing for social good and broad community engagement, versus optimizing for scientific and analytical efficiency.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberA04
JournalJournal of Science Communication
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

citizen
science
Sustainable development
interaction
popularity
data analysis
sustainability
efficiency
ability
knowledge
community
experience

Keywords

  • Citizen science
  • Public engagement with science and technology
  • Social inclusion

Cite this

Spiers, H., Swanson, A., Fortson, L. F., Simmons, B. D., Trouille, L., Blickhan, S., & Lintott, C. (2019). Everyone counts? Design considerations in online citizen science. Journal of Science Communication, 18(1), [A04]. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18010204

Everyone counts? Design considerations in online citizen science. / Spiers, Helen; Swanson, Alexandra; Fortson, Lucy F; Simmons, Brooke D.; Trouille, Laura; Blickhan, Samantha; Lintott, Chris.

In: Journal of Science Communication, Vol. 18, No. 1, A04, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Spiers, H, Swanson, A, Fortson, LF, Simmons, BD, Trouille, L, Blickhan, S & Lintott, C 2019, 'Everyone counts? Design considerations in online citizen science' Journal of Science Communication, vol. 18, no. 1, A04. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18010204
Spiers, Helen ; Swanson, Alexandra ; Fortson, Lucy F ; Simmons, Brooke D. ; Trouille, Laura ; Blickhan, Samantha ; Lintott, Chris. / Everyone counts? Design considerations in online citizen science. In: Journal of Science Communication. 2019 ; Vol. 18, No. 1.
@article{6c1b2518187e4c6d8e8e8f221d632fa1,
title = "Everyone counts? Design considerations in online citizen science",
abstract = "Effective classification of large datasets is a ubiquitous challenge across multiple knowledge domains. One solution gaining in popularity is to perform distributed data analysis via online citizen science platforms, such as the Zooniverse. The resulting growth in project numbers is increasing the need to improve understanding of the volunteer experience; as the sustainability of citizen science is dependent on our ability to design for engagement and usability. Here, we examine volunteer interaction with 63 projects, representing the most comprehensive collection of online citizen science project data gathered to date. Together, this analysis demonstrates how subtle project design changes can influence many facets of volunteer interaction, including when and how much volunteers interact, and, importantly, who participates. Our findings highlight the tension between designing for social good and broad community engagement, versus optimizing for scientific and analytical efficiency.",
keywords = "Citizen science, Public engagement with science and technology, Social inclusion",
author = "Helen Spiers and Alexandra Swanson and Fortson, {Lucy F} and Simmons, {Brooke D.} and Laura Trouille and Samantha Blickhan and Chris Lintott",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.22323/2.18010204",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
journal = "Journal of Science Communication",
issn = "1824-2049",
publisher = "Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati (SISSA)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Everyone counts? Design considerations in online citizen science

AU - Spiers, Helen

AU - Swanson, Alexandra

AU - Fortson, Lucy F

AU - Simmons, Brooke D.

AU - Trouille, Laura

AU - Blickhan, Samantha

AU - Lintott, Chris

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Effective classification of large datasets is a ubiquitous challenge across multiple knowledge domains. One solution gaining in popularity is to perform distributed data analysis via online citizen science platforms, such as the Zooniverse. The resulting growth in project numbers is increasing the need to improve understanding of the volunteer experience; as the sustainability of citizen science is dependent on our ability to design for engagement and usability. Here, we examine volunteer interaction with 63 projects, representing the most comprehensive collection of online citizen science project data gathered to date. Together, this analysis demonstrates how subtle project design changes can influence many facets of volunteer interaction, including when and how much volunteers interact, and, importantly, who participates. Our findings highlight the tension between designing for social good and broad community engagement, versus optimizing for scientific and analytical efficiency.

AB - Effective classification of large datasets is a ubiquitous challenge across multiple knowledge domains. One solution gaining in popularity is to perform distributed data analysis via online citizen science platforms, such as the Zooniverse. The resulting growth in project numbers is increasing the need to improve understanding of the volunteer experience; as the sustainability of citizen science is dependent on our ability to design for engagement and usability. Here, we examine volunteer interaction with 63 projects, representing the most comprehensive collection of online citizen science project data gathered to date. Together, this analysis demonstrates how subtle project design changes can influence many facets of volunteer interaction, including when and how much volunteers interact, and, importantly, who participates. Our findings highlight the tension between designing for social good and broad community engagement, versus optimizing for scientific and analytical efficiency.

KW - Citizen science

KW - Public engagement with science and technology

KW - Social inclusion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061900506&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061900506&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.22323/2.18010204

DO - 10.22323/2.18010204

M3 - Article

VL - 18

JO - Journal of Science Communication

JF - Journal of Science Communication

SN - 1824-2049

IS - 1

M1 - A04

ER -