Everyday discrimination as a predictor of maladaptive and adaptive eating: Findings from EAT 2018

Cynthia Y Yoon; Vivienne M Hazzard; Rebecca L Tavernier; Susan M. Mason; Dianne Neumark-Sztainer

doi:10.1016/j.appet.2021.105878

Everyday discrimination as a predictor of maladaptive and adaptive eating: Findings from EAT 2018

Cynthia Y Yoon, Vivienne M Hazzard, Rebecca L Tavernier, Susan M. Mason, Dianne Neumark-Sztainer

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Various types of stressors are associated with maladaptive eating, but how the stressor of everyday discrimination (e.g., less respect, poorer service) relates to maladaptive eating and adaptive eating remains unclear. We examined everyday discrimination as a predictor of maladaptive and adaptive eating. Data were collected in a population-based study, Eating and Activity over Time (N = 1410, ages 18–30). Everyday discrimination was categorized as none, low, moderate, or high. Outcomes included maladaptive eating (i.e., overeating and binge eating) and adaptive eating (i.e., intuitive eating and mindful eating). Modified Poisson regressions estimated the prevalence ratios (PRs) for overeating and binge eating associated with everyday discrimination. Linear regressions estimated associations between everyday discrimination and intuitive and mindful eating scores. After adjustment for age, ethnicity/race, gender, and socioeconomic status, moderate and high levels of discriminatory experiences were each associated with a significantly greater prevalence of binge eating (PR = 2.2, [95% CI = 1.3–3.7] and PR = 3.1, [95% CI = 2.0–4.7], respectively) and lower intuitive (β = −0.4, [95% CI = −0.7, −0.2] and β = −0.5 [95% CI = −0.8, −0.3], respectively), and mindful eating scores (β = −0.3, [95% CI = −0.6, −0.1] and β = −0.5 [95% CI = −0.8, −0.3], respectively) compared to young adults with no discriminatory experience. Public health efforts to prevent maladaptive eating and encourage the adoption of adaptive eating should consider the potential contribution of everyday discrimination and the need to advocate for equity and inclusion.

Original language	English (US)
Article number	105878
Journal	Appetite
Volume	170
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105878
State	Published - Mar 1 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Data collection for the study was supported by Grant Numbers R01HL127077 and R35HL139853 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (PI: Dianne Neumark-Sztainer). Cynthia Yoon's time was supported by Award Number T32DK083250 (PI: Robert W. Jeffery) from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Vivienne Hazzard's time was supported by Award Number T32MH082761 (PI: Scott Crow) from the National Institute of Mental Health. Rebecca Emery's time was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences under TL1 R002493 (PI: Fulkerson) and UL1 TR002494 (PI: Blazar). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, or National Institute of Mental Health, the National Institutes of Health, or National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences.

Funding Information:
Data collection for the study was supported by Grant Numbers R01HL127077 and R35HL139853 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (PI: Dianne Neumark-Sztainer). Cynthia Yoon's time was supported by Award Number T32DK083250 (PI: Robert W. Jeffery) from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases . Vivienne Hazzard's time was supported by Award Number T32MH082761 (PI: Scott Crow) from the National Institute of Mental Health . Rebecca Emery's time was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences under TL1 R002493 (PI: Fulkerson) and UL1 TR002494 (PI: Blazar). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, or National Institute of Mental Health, the National Institutes of Health, or National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021

Keywords

Binge eating
Everyday discrimination
Intuitive eating
Mindful eating
Overeating

PubMed: MeSH publication types

Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Publisher link

10.1016/j.appet.2021.105878

Find It

Find It at U of M Libraries

Cite this

@article{732d4b20e8394b388e16cbaa28ce6648,

title = "Everyday discrimination as a predictor of maladaptive and adaptive eating: Findings from EAT 2018",

abstract = "Various types of stressors are associated with maladaptive eating, but how the stressor of everyday discrimination (e.g., less respect, poorer service) relates to maladaptive eating and adaptive eating remains unclear. We examined everyday discrimination as a predictor of maladaptive and adaptive eating. Data were collected in a population-based study, Eating and Activity over Time (N = 1410, ages 18–30). Everyday discrimination was categorized as none, low, moderate, or high. Outcomes included maladaptive eating (i.e., overeating and binge eating) and adaptive eating (i.e., intuitive eating and mindful eating). Modified Poisson regressions estimated the prevalence ratios (PRs) for overeating and binge eating associated with everyday discrimination. Linear regressions estimated associations between everyday discrimination and intuitive and mindful eating scores. After adjustment for age, ethnicity/race, gender, and socioeconomic status, moderate and high levels of discriminatory experiences were each associated with a significantly greater prevalence of binge eating (PR = 2.2, [95% CI = 1.3–3.7] and PR = 3.1, [95% CI = 2.0–4.7], respectively) and lower intuitive (β = −0.4, [95% CI = −0.7, −0.2] and β = −0.5 [95% CI = −0.8, −0.3], respectively), and mindful eating scores (β = −0.3, [95% CI = −0.6, −0.1] and β = −0.5 [95% CI = −0.8, −0.3], respectively) compared to young adults with no discriminatory experience. Public health efforts to prevent maladaptive eating and encourage the adoption of adaptive eating should consider the potential contribution of everyday discrimination and the need to advocate for equity and inclusion.",

keywords = "Binge eating, Everyday discrimination, Intuitive eating, Mindful eating, Overeating",

author = "Yoon, {Cynthia Y} and Hazzard, {Vivienne M} and Tavernier, {Rebecca L} and Mason, {Susan M.} and Dianne Neumark-Sztainer",

note = "Funding Information: Data collection for the study was supported by Grant Numbers R01HL127077 and R35HL139853 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (PI: Dianne Neumark-Sztainer). Cynthia Yoon's time was supported by Award Number T32DK083250 (PI: Robert W. Jeffery) from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Vivienne Hazzard's time was supported by Award Number T32MH082761 (PI: Scott Crow) from the National Institute of Mental Health. Rebecca Emery's time was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences under TL1 R002493 (PI: Fulkerson) and UL1 TR002494 (PI: Blazar). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, or National Institute of Mental Health, the National Institutes of Health, or National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. Funding Information: Data collection for the study was supported by Grant Numbers R01HL127077 and R35HL139853 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (PI: Dianne Neumark-Sztainer). Cynthia Yoon's time was supported by Award Number T32DK083250 (PI: Robert W. Jeffery) from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases . Vivienne Hazzard's time was supported by Award Number T32MH082761 (PI: Scott Crow) from the National Institute of Mental Health . Rebecca Emery's time was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences under TL1 R002493 (PI: Fulkerson) and UL1 TR002494 (PI: Blazar). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, or National Institute of Mental Health, the National Institutes of Health, or National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021",

year = "2022",

month = mar,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.appet.2021.105878",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "170",

journal = "Appetite",

issn = "0195-6663",

publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Everyday discrimination as a predictor of maladaptive and adaptive eating

T2 - Findings from EAT 2018

AU - Yoon, Cynthia Y

AU - Hazzard, Vivienne M

AU - Tavernier, Rebecca L

AU - Mason, Susan M.

AU - Neumark-Sztainer, Dianne

N1 - Funding Information: Data collection for the study was supported by Grant Numbers R01HL127077 and R35HL139853 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (PI: Dianne Neumark-Sztainer). Cynthia Yoon's time was supported by Award Number T32DK083250 (PI: Robert W. Jeffery) from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Vivienne Hazzard's time was supported by Award Number T32MH082761 (PI: Scott Crow) from the National Institute of Mental Health. Rebecca Emery's time was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences under TL1 R002493 (PI: Fulkerson) and UL1 TR002494 (PI: Blazar). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, or National Institute of Mental Health, the National Institutes of Health, or National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. Funding Information: Data collection for the study was supported by Grant Numbers R01HL127077 and R35HL139853 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (PI: Dianne Neumark-Sztainer). Cynthia Yoon's time was supported by Award Number T32DK083250 (PI: Robert W. Jeffery) from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases . Vivienne Hazzard's time was supported by Award Number T32MH082761 (PI: Scott Crow) from the National Institute of Mental Health . Rebecca Emery's time was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences under TL1 R002493 (PI: Fulkerson) and UL1 TR002494 (PI: Blazar). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, or National Institute of Mental Health, the National Institutes of Health, or National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. Publisher Copyright: © 2021

PY - 2022/3/1

Y1 - 2022/3/1

N2 - Various types of stressors are associated with maladaptive eating, but how the stressor of everyday discrimination (e.g., less respect, poorer service) relates to maladaptive eating and adaptive eating remains unclear. We examined everyday discrimination as a predictor of maladaptive and adaptive eating. Data were collected in a population-based study, Eating and Activity over Time (N = 1410, ages 18–30). Everyday discrimination was categorized as none, low, moderate, or high. Outcomes included maladaptive eating (i.e., overeating and binge eating) and adaptive eating (i.e., intuitive eating and mindful eating). Modified Poisson regressions estimated the prevalence ratios (PRs) for overeating and binge eating associated with everyday discrimination. Linear regressions estimated associations between everyday discrimination and intuitive and mindful eating scores. After adjustment for age, ethnicity/race, gender, and socioeconomic status, moderate and high levels of discriminatory experiences were each associated with a significantly greater prevalence of binge eating (PR = 2.2, [95% CI = 1.3–3.7] and PR = 3.1, [95% CI = 2.0–4.7], respectively) and lower intuitive (β = −0.4, [95% CI = −0.7, −0.2] and β = −0.5 [95% CI = −0.8, −0.3], respectively), and mindful eating scores (β = −0.3, [95% CI = −0.6, −0.1] and β = −0.5 [95% CI = −0.8, −0.3], respectively) compared to young adults with no discriminatory experience. Public health efforts to prevent maladaptive eating and encourage the adoption of adaptive eating should consider the potential contribution of everyday discrimination and the need to advocate for equity and inclusion.

AB - Various types of stressors are associated with maladaptive eating, but how the stressor of everyday discrimination (e.g., less respect, poorer service) relates to maladaptive eating and adaptive eating remains unclear. We examined everyday discrimination as a predictor of maladaptive and adaptive eating. Data were collected in a population-based study, Eating and Activity over Time (N = 1410, ages 18–30). Everyday discrimination was categorized as none, low, moderate, or high. Outcomes included maladaptive eating (i.e., overeating and binge eating) and adaptive eating (i.e., intuitive eating and mindful eating). Modified Poisson regressions estimated the prevalence ratios (PRs) for overeating and binge eating associated with everyday discrimination. Linear regressions estimated associations between everyday discrimination and intuitive and mindful eating scores. After adjustment for age, ethnicity/race, gender, and socioeconomic status, moderate and high levels of discriminatory experiences were each associated with a significantly greater prevalence of binge eating (PR = 2.2, [95% CI = 1.3–3.7] and PR = 3.1, [95% CI = 2.0–4.7], respectively) and lower intuitive (β = −0.4, [95% CI = −0.7, −0.2] and β = −0.5 [95% CI = −0.8, −0.3], respectively), and mindful eating scores (β = −0.3, [95% CI = −0.6, −0.1] and β = −0.5 [95% CI = −0.8, −0.3], respectively) compared to young adults with no discriminatory experience. Public health efforts to prevent maladaptive eating and encourage the adoption of adaptive eating should consider the potential contribution of everyday discrimination and the need to advocate for equity and inclusion.

KW - Binge eating

KW - Everyday discrimination

KW - Intuitive eating

KW - Mindful eating

KW - Overeating

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121767103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85121767103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105878

DO - 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105878

M3 - Article

C2 - 34952131

AN - SCOPUS:85121767103

SN - 0195-6663

VL - 170

JO - Appetite

JF - Appetite

M1 - 105878

ER -

Everyday discrimination as a predictor of maladaptive and adaptive eating: Findings from EAT 2018

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

PubMed: MeSH publication types

UN SDGs

Publisher link

Find It

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this