Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Experts@Minnesota Home
Home
Profiles
Research units
University Assets
Projects and Grants
Research output
Datasets
Press/Media
Activities
Fellowships, Honors, and Prizes
Impacts
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Event-Related Potential Markers of Suicidality in Adolescents
Deniz Doruk Camsari
,
Charles P. Lewis
, Ayse Irem Sonmez
, Can Ozger
, Parmis Fatih
, Deniz Yuruk
, Julia Shekunov
, Jennifer L. Vande Voort
, Paul E. Croarkin
Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
9
Scopus citations
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Event-Related Potential Markers of Suicidality in Adolescents'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Suicidal Ideation
100%
Event-related Potentials
100%
Suicidality
100%
Suicidal Behavior
80%
Suicide
60%
N100
60%
Implicit Association Test
60%
D-score
60%
Group Differences
40%
Implicit Associations
40%
Treatment Strategy
20%
Clinical Assessment
20%
Neural Correlates
20%
Test Evaluation
20%
Behavioral Outcomes
20%
Predictive Models
20%
Assessment Approach
20%
Clinical Measures
20%
Potential Measure
20%
Incongruity
20%
Healthy Controls
20%
P200
20%
Neurophysiological Test
20%
Model Combining
20%
D-groups
20%
Healthy Adolescents
20%
Hierarchical Generalized Linear Model
20%
Electroencephalography
20%
Score Differences
20%
Clinical Risk Factors
20%
Temporal Clustering
20%
Event-related Potentials Data
20%
Attentional Resources
20%
64-channel
20%
Late Positive Potential
20%
Parieto-occipital Cortex
20%
Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale
20%
Cognitive Markers
20%
Behavioural Correlation
20%
Psychology
Event-Related Potential
100%
Suicidality
100%
Suicidal Ideation
100%
Group Difference
40%
Rating Scale
20%
Generalized Linear Model
20%
Clustering
20%
Occipital Cortex
20%
Controllability
20%
Neuroscience
Event-Related Potential
100%
Suicidal Ideation
100%
Suicidal Behavior
80%
Occipital Lobe
20%
Clinical Assessment
20%
Generalized Linear Model
20%
Risk Factor
20%