Event-related potential evidence for a dual-locus model of global/local processing

Kirsten A. Dalrymple, Alan Kingstone, Todd C. Handy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations


We investigated the perceptual time course of global/local processing using event-related potentials (ERPs). Participants discriminated the global or local level of hierarchical letters of different sizes and densities. Participants were faster to discriminate the local level of large/sparse letters and the global level of small/dense letters. This was mirrored in early ERP components: The N1/N2 had smaller peak amplitudes when participants made discriminations at the level that took precedence. Only global discriminations for large/sparse letters led to amplitude enhancement of the later P3 component, suggesting that additional attention-demanding processes are involved in discriminating the global level of these stimuli. Our findings suggest a dual-locus time course for global/local processing: (a) Level precedence occurs early in visual processing; (b) extra processing is required at a later stage, but only for global discriminations of large, sparse, stimuli, which may require additional attentional resources for active grouping.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)456-470
Number of pages15
JournalCognitive Neuropsychology
Issue number5
StatePublished - Jul 2009
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
K.A.D. was supported by the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) and the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research (MSFHR). A.K. was supported by NSERC, the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. T.C.H. was supported by NSERC and MSFHR.


  • Attention
  • Event-related potentials
  • Global/local processing
  • Hierarchical stimuli


Dive into the research topics of 'Event-related potential evidence for a dual-locus model of global/local processing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this