Evaluative care guideline compliance is associated with provision of benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery

Seth A. Strope, John T. Wei, Alexandria Smith, Timothy J. Wilt, Christopher S. Saigal, Sean P. Elliott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations


Objective: To determine the impact of evaluative care guideline compliance on surgical intervention for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods: From Medicare claims data, we developed a cohort of men new to a urologist with a diagnosis of BPH. We determined urologists' compliance with guideline recommended care (3 months) and their time- and geography-standardized average monthly Medicare expenditures (1 year). At the level of the urologist, we assessed the impact of these measures on the use of surgical therapy within 1 year of the new patient visit. Results: Of 10 248 patients in the cohort, 675 received surgical intervention (6.7%). Guideline compliance (2% received surgery in highest quintile; 11% lowest quintile) was associated with surgical intervention. The results were robust to adjustment for patient and surgeon factors (Guideline Compliance, odds ratio = 0.09; 95% confidence interval = 0.06-0.15, highest to lowest adherence). Conclusion: Urologists who tend to follow the AUA best practice guidelines for BPH evaluation perform surgical interventions on their BPH patients less frequently than urologists who do not follow these guidelines.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)84-89
Number of pages6
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jul 2012

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Funding Support: This work was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases through the Urologic Diseases in America Project ( N01-DK-1-2460 ).


Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluative care guideline compliance is associated with provision of benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this