Evaluation of the roundabout capacity model in HCM6 edition and HCM 2010 on a multilane roundabout

Rongsheng Chen, John Hourdos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study evaluated the performance of the new Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (HCM6) roundabout capacity model at a multilane roundabout in Richfield, Minnesota. Traffic flow rates and gap acceptance data were collected during 20 hours of afternoon peak period traffic over four days. The observed critical headways for the left and right lanes was equal to 4.43 and 3.99 s while the observed follow-up headways were 3.05 and 2.96 s, respectively. Roundabout capacity curves for both lanes were built through the collected flow information, as well as through the observed headways and the HCM formula. As compared with the field observed results, the default model in HCM6 overestimated the capacity of the study roundabout. The default model in HCM 2010 closely estimated the capacity for the right lane, but overestimated the capacity of the left lane when the circulating flow rate was high. The HCM6 model was calibrated with the observed critical and follow-up headways, as well as by calibrating the intercept of the model using only the follow-up headway. The fully calibrated model overestimated the capacity of the right lane by 7-10% as the circulating flow decreases and overestimated the capacity of the left lane by 7% and 31%. The partially calibrated model overestimated the capacity of the left lane by 6% and overestimated the capacity of the right lane by at most 10% under low circulating flow rate, but it underestimated the capacity by at most 21% under high circulating flow rate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)23-34
Number of pages12
JournalTransportation Research Record
Volume2672
Issue number15
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Flow rate

Cite this

Evaluation of the roundabout capacity model in HCM6 edition and HCM 2010 on a multilane roundabout. / Chen, Rongsheng; Hourdos, John.

In: Transportation Research Record, Vol. 2672, No. 15, 01.01.2018, p. 23-34.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e43c70bdfb9747449f742f127ac0dbb4,
title = "Evaluation of the roundabout capacity model in HCM6 edition and HCM 2010 on a multilane roundabout",
abstract = "This study evaluated the performance of the new Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (HCM6) roundabout capacity model at a multilane roundabout in Richfield, Minnesota. Traffic flow rates and gap acceptance data were collected during 20 hours of afternoon peak period traffic over four days. The observed critical headways for the left and right lanes was equal to 4.43 and 3.99 s while the observed follow-up headways were 3.05 and 2.96 s, respectively. Roundabout capacity curves for both lanes were built through the collected flow information, as well as through the observed headways and the HCM formula. As compared with the field observed results, the default model in HCM6 overestimated the capacity of the study roundabout. The default model in HCM 2010 closely estimated the capacity for the right lane, but overestimated the capacity of the left lane when the circulating flow rate was high. The HCM6 model was calibrated with the observed critical and follow-up headways, as well as by calibrating the intercept of the model using only the follow-up headway. The fully calibrated model overestimated the capacity of the right lane by 7-10{\%} as the circulating flow decreases and overestimated the capacity of the left lane by 7{\%} and 31{\%}. The partially calibrated model overestimated the capacity of the left lane by 6{\%} and overestimated the capacity of the right lane by at most 10{\%} under low circulating flow rate, but it underestimated the capacity by at most 21{\%} under high circulating flow rate.",
author = "Rongsheng Chen and John Hourdos",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0361198118794287",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2672",
pages = "23--34",
journal = "Transportation Research Record",
issn = "0361-1981",
publisher = "US National Research Council",
number = "15",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of the roundabout capacity model in HCM6 edition and HCM 2010 on a multilane roundabout

AU - Chen, Rongsheng

AU - Hourdos, John

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - This study evaluated the performance of the new Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (HCM6) roundabout capacity model at a multilane roundabout in Richfield, Minnesota. Traffic flow rates and gap acceptance data were collected during 20 hours of afternoon peak period traffic over four days. The observed critical headways for the left and right lanes was equal to 4.43 and 3.99 s while the observed follow-up headways were 3.05 and 2.96 s, respectively. Roundabout capacity curves for both lanes were built through the collected flow information, as well as through the observed headways and the HCM formula. As compared with the field observed results, the default model in HCM6 overestimated the capacity of the study roundabout. The default model in HCM 2010 closely estimated the capacity for the right lane, but overestimated the capacity of the left lane when the circulating flow rate was high. The HCM6 model was calibrated with the observed critical and follow-up headways, as well as by calibrating the intercept of the model using only the follow-up headway. The fully calibrated model overestimated the capacity of the right lane by 7-10% as the circulating flow decreases and overestimated the capacity of the left lane by 7% and 31%. The partially calibrated model overestimated the capacity of the left lane by 6% and overestimated the capacity of the right lane by at most 10% under low circulating flow rate, but it underestimated the capacity by at most 21% under high circulating flow rate.

AB - This study evaluated the performance of the new Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (HCM6) roundabout capacity model at a multilane roundabout in Richfield, Minnesota. Traffic flow rates and gap acceptance data were collected during 20 hours of afternoon peak period traffic over four days. The observed critical headways for the left and right lanes was equal to 4.43 and 3.99 s while the observed follow-up headways were 3.05 and 2.96 s, respectively. Roundabout capacity curves for both lanes were built through the collected flow information, as well as through the observed headways and the HCM formula. As compared with the field observed results, the default model in HCM6 overestimated the capacity of the study roundabout. The default model in HCM 2010 closely estimated the capacity for the right lane, but overestimated the capacity of the left lane when the circulating flow rate was high. The HCM6 model was calibrated with the observed critical and follow-up headways, as well as by calibrating the intercept of the model using only the follow-up headway. The fully calibrated model overestimated the capacity of the right lane by 7-10% as the circulating flow decreases and overestimated the capacity of the left lane by 7% and 31%. The partially calibrated model overestimated the capacity of the left lane by 6% and overestimated the capacity of the right lane by at most 10% under low circulating flow rate, but it underestimated the capacity by at most 21% under high circulating flow rate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060950830&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060950830&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0361198118794287

DO - 10.1177/0361198118794287

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85060950830

VL - 2672

SP - 23

EP - 34

JO - Transportation Research Record

JF - Transportation Research Record

SN - 0361-1981

IS - 15

ER -