Evaluation of Patient Needs and Patient Navigator Communication About Cervical Cancer Prevention in Appalachian Kentucky

Elisia L. Cohen, Allison M. Scott, Carol R. White, Mark B. Dignan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Few studies describe the way patient navigation processes may address disparities in treatment and follow-up care for medically underserved populations. Using a social ecological framework, we analyzed survey assessments of 519 patients completing a randomized navigation trial in Appalachia Kentucky to examine patient-reported barriers to follow-up cervical cancer care. We also analyzed in-depth interview transcripts with 4 lay patient navigators in the trial to identify additional barriers to follow-up care and to learn what communication strategies navigators use to successfully (or unsuccessfully) help patients navigate around those barriers. Our analysis provides insight into how patient navigation may improve adherence to follow-up care through assisted uncertainty management. We also discuss opportunities for improving navigator training to address disparities in clinical outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)72-94
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Communication
Volume63
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2013

Fingerprint

Navigation
cancer
communication
Communication
evaluation
uncertainty
Evaluation
Kentucky
Cervical Cancer
interview
management
Uncertainty

Cite this

Evaluation of Patient Needs and Patient Navigator Communication About Cervical Cancer Prevention in Appalachian Kentucky. / Cohen, Elisia L.; Scott, Allison M.; White, Carol R.; Dignan, Mark B.

In: Journal of Communication, Vol. 63, No. 1, 01.02.2013, p. 72-94.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7dcbf6baf56145be9f7ee0c0571cff5e,
title = "Evaluation of Patient Needs and Patient Navigator Communication About Cervical Cancer Prevention in Appalachian Kentucky",
abstract = "Few studies describe the way patient navigation processes may address disparities in treatment and follow-up care for medically underserved populations. Using a social ecological framework, we analyzed survey assessments of 519 patients completing a randomized navigation trial in Appalachia Kentucky to examine patient-reported barriers to follow-up cervical cancer care. We also analyzed in-depth interview transcripts with 4 lay patient navigators in the trial to identify additional barriers to follow-up care and to learn what communication strategies navigators use to successfully (or unsuccessfully) help patients navigate around those barriers. Our analysis provides insight into how patient navigation may improve adherence to follow-up care through assisted uncertainty management. We also discuss opportunities for improving navigator training to address disparities in clinical outcomes.",
author = "Cohen, {Elisia L.} and Scott, {Allison M.} and White, {Carol R.} and Dignan, {Mark B.}",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jcom.12002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "72--94",
journal = "Journal of Communication",
issn = "0021-9916",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of Patient Needs and Patient Navigator Communication About Cervical Cancer Prevention in Appalachian Kentucky

AU - Cohen, Elisia L.

AU - Scott, Allison M.

AU - White, Carol R.

AU - Dignan, Mark B.

PY - 2013/2/1

Y1 - 2013/2/1

N2 - Few studies describe the way patient navigation processes may address disparities in treatment and follow-up care for medically underserved populations. Using a social ecological framework, we analyzed survey assessments of 519 patients completing a randomized navigation trial in Appalachia Kentucky to examine patient-reported barriers to follow-up cervical cancer care. We also analyzed in-depth interview transcripts with 4 lay patient navigators in the trial to identify additional barriers to follow-up care and to learn what communication strategies navigators use to successfully (or unsuccessfully) help patients navigate around those barriers. Our analysis provides insight into how patient navigation may improve adherence to follow-up care through assisted uncertainty management. We also discuss opportunities for improving navigator training to address disparities in clinical outcomes.

AB - Few studies describe the way patient navigation processes may address disparities in treatment and follow-up care for medically underserved populations. Using a social ecological framework, we analyzed survey assessments of 519 patients completing a randomized navigation trial in Appalachia Kentucky to examine patient-reported barriers to follow-up cervical cancer care. We also analyzed in-depth interview transcripts with 4 lay patient navigators in the trial to identify additional barriers to follow-up care and to learn what communication strategies navigators use to successfully (or unsuccessfully) help patients navigate around those barriers. Our analysis provides insight into how patient navigation may improve adherence to follow-up care through assisted uncertainty management. We also discuss opportunities for improving navigator training to address disparities in clinical outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873806215&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873806215&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jcom.12002

DO - 10.1111/jcom.12002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84873806215

VL - 63

SP - 72

EP - 94

JO - Journal of Communication

JF - Journal of Communication

SN - 0021-9916

IS - 1

ER -