Evaluation of Partial Flow Dilution Systems for Very Low PM Mass Measurements

Liem Pham, Jiacheng Yang, Kent Johnson, Thomas Durbin, Georgios Karavalakis, Wayne Miller, David Kittelson, Heejung S. Jung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Particulate matter (PM) mass measurement methodologies were improved considerably with the application of Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 1065 for the 2007 standards for heavy-duty engines that emphasized PM. However, there is still a need to improve the understanding of and the confidence in mass measurements for light-duty vehicles, which are now being subjected to more stringent PM standards. The purpose of this study is to evaluate commercially available partial flow dilutors (PFDs), with a particular focus on their equivalency with the standard constant volume sampler (CVS) tunnel method and the ability to provide reproducible measurements at low PM emission levels. For the main PFD comparison, simultaneous testing was conducted with the three PFDs, over federal test procedure (FTP) and US06 tests. The results of the calibrations and proportionality tests all showed good performance for the PFDs. The exhaust flow meters (EFMs) for the PFDs showed measurements within 2% or less of a calibration source. The PFDs also showed good level proportionality and can easily meet the CFR 1066 requirements for light-duty vehicles and 1065 requirements for all tests performed. Larger differences were seen for the main comparisons between the CVS and the different PFDs during the FTP testing, with the relative difference of PM emissions between the PFDs and the CVS varying from − 16.5 to − 0.6%, with an average pooled difference of − 8.5%. These FTP differences only represented 0.00 to 0.11 mg/mile on an absolute basis, however, and could be attributed to difficulties making and weighing filter mass measurements at such low levels. For the US06 cycle, the differences between the PFDs and the CVS were not statistically significant and ranged from − 6.7 to − 0.7% and up to 0.07 mg/mile.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)247-259
Number of pages13
JournalEmission Control Science and Technology
Volume4
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

Particulate Matter
Dilution
particulate matter
dilution
sampler
Calibration
Testing
Weighing
Tunnels
calibration
evaluation
Engines
flowmeter
test
engine
tunnel
filter
methodology

Keywords

  • Emission control
  • Particle emission
  • Particle measurements
  • Vehicle emission

Cite this

Pham, L., Yang, J., Johnson, K., Durbin, T., Karavalakis, G., Miller, W., ... Jung, H. S. (2018). Evaluation of Partial Flow Dilution Systems for Very Low PM Mass Measurements. Emission Control Science and Technology, 4(4), 247-259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40825-018-0099-1

Evaluation of Partial Flow Dilution Systems for Very Low PM Mass Measurements. / Pham, Liem; Yang, Jiacheng; Johnson, Kent; Durbin, Thomas; Karavalakis, Georgios; Miller, Wayne; Kittelson, David; Jung, Heejung S.

In: Emission Control Science and Technology, Vol. 4, No. 4, 01.12.2018, p. 247-259.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pham, L, Yang, J, Johnson, K, Durbin, T, Karavalakis, G, Miller, W, Kittelson, D & Jung, HS 2018, 'Evaluation of Partial Flow Dilution Systems for Very Low PM Mass Measurements', Emission Control Science and Technology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 247-259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40825-018-0099-1
Pham, Liem ; Yang, Jiacheng ; Johnson, Kent ; Durbin, Thomas ; Karavalakis, Georgios ; Miller, Wayne ; Kittelson, David ; Jung, Heejung S. / Evaluation of Partial Flow Dilution Systems for Very Low PM Mass Measurements. In: Emission Control Science and Technology. 2018 ; Vol. 4, No. 4. pp. 247-259.
@article{80f9af2736ee4f80965b518470173057,
title = "Evaluation of Partial Flow Dilution Systems for Very Low PM Mass Measurements",
abstract = "Particulate matter (PM) mass measurement methodologies were improved considerably with the application of Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 1065 for the 2007 standards for heavy-duty engines that emphasized PM. However, there is still a need to improve the understanding of and the confidence in mass measurements for light-duty vehicles, which are now being subjected to more stringent PM standards. The purpose of this study is to evaluate commercially available partial flow dilutors (PFDs), with a particular focus on their equivalency with the standard constant volume sampler (CVS) tunnel method and the ability to provide reproducible measurements at low PM emission levels. For the main PFD comparison, simultaneous testing was conducted with the three PFDs, over federal test procedure (FTP) and US06 tests. The results of the calibrations and proportionality tests all showed good performance for the PFDs. The exhaust flow meters (EFMs) for the PFDs showed measurements within 2{\%} or less of a calibration source. The PFDs also showed good level proportionality and can easily meet the CFR 1066 requirements for light-duty vehicles and 1065 requirements for all tests performed. Larger differences were seen for the main comparisons between the CVS and the different PFDs during the FTP testing, with the relative difference of PM emissions between the PFDs and the CVS varying from − 16.5 to − 0.6{\%}, with an average pooled difference of − 8.5{\%}. These FTP differences only represented 0.00 to 0.11 mg/mile on an absolute basis, however, and could be attributed to difficulties making and weighing filter mass measurements at such low levels. For the US06 cycle, the differences between the PFDs and the CVS were not statistically significant and ranged from − 6.7 to − 0.7{\%} and up to 0.07 mg/mile.",
keywords = "Emission control, Particle emission, Particle measurements, Vehicle emission",
author = "Liem Pham and Jiacheng Yang and Kent Johnson and Thomas Durbin and Georgios Karavalakis and Wayne Miller and David Kittelson and Jung, {Heejung S.}",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s40825-018-0099-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "247--259",
journal = "Emission Control Science and Technology",
issn = "2199-3629",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing AG",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of Partial Flow Dilution Systems for Very Low PM Mass Measurements

AU - Pham, Liem

AU - Yang, Jiacheng

AU - Johnson, Kent

AU - Durbin, Thomas

AU - Karavalakis, Georgios

AU - Miller, Wayne

AU - Kittelson, David

AU - Jung, Heejung S.

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Particulate matter (PM) mass measurement methodologies were improved considerably with the application of Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 1065 for the 2007 standards for heavy-duty engines that emphasized PM. However, there is still a need to improve the understanding of and the confidence in mass measurements for light-duty vehicles, which are now being subjected to more stringent PM standards. The purpose of this study is to evaluate commercially available partial flow dilutors (PFDs), with a particular focus on their equivalency with the standard constant volume sampler (CVS) tunnel method and the ability to provide reproducible measurements at low PM emission levels. For the main PFD comparison, simultaneous testing was conducted with the three PFDs, over federal test procedure (FTP) and US06 tests. The results of the calibrations and proportionality tests all showed good performance for the PFDs. The exhaust flow meters (EFMs) for the PFDs showed measurements within 2% or less of a calibration source. The PFDs also showed good level proportionality and can easily meet the CFR 1066 requirements for light-duty vehicles and 1065 requirements for all tests performed. Larger differences were seen for the main comparisons between the CVS and the different PFDs during the FTP testing, with the relative difference of PM emissions between the PFDs and the CVS varying from − 16.5 to − 0.6%, with an average pooled difference of − 8.5%. These FTP differences only represented 0.00 to 0.11 mg/mile on an absolute basis, however, and could be attributed to difficulties making and weighing filter mass measurements at such low levels. For the US06 cycle, the differences between the PFDs and the CVS were not statistically significant and ranged from − 6.7 to − 0.7% and up to 0.07 mg/mile.

AB - Particulate matter (PM) mass measurement methodologies were improved considerably with the application of Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 1065 for the 2007 standards for heavy-duty engines that emphasized PM. However, there is still a need to improve the understanding of and the confidence in mass measurements for light-duty vehicles, which are now being subjected to more stringent PM standards. The purpose of this study is to evaluate commercially available partial flow dilutors (PFDs), with a particular focus on their equivalency with the standard constant volume sampler (CVS) tunnel method and the ability to provide reproducible measurements at low PM emission levels. For the main PFD comparison, simultaneous testing was conducted with the three PFDs, over federal test procedure (FTP) and US06 tests. The results of the calibrations and proportionality tests all showed good performance for the PFDs. The exhaust flow meters (EFMs) for the PFDs showed measurements within 2% or less of a calibration source. The PFDs also showed good level proportionality and can easily meet the CFR 1066 requirements for light-duty vehicles and 1065 requirements for all tests performed. Larger differences were seen for the main comparisons between the CVS and the different PFDs during the FTP testing, with the relative difference of PM emissions between the PFDs and the CVS varying from − 16.5 to − 0.6%, with an average pooled difference of − 8.5%. These FTP differences only represented 0.00 to 0.11 mg/mile on an absolute basis, however, and could be attributed to difficulties making and weighing filter mass measurements at such low levels. For the US06 cycle, the differences between the PFDs and the CVS were not statistically significant and ranged from − 6.7 to − 0.7% and up to 0.07 mg/mile.

KW - Emission control

KW - Particle emission

KW - Particle measurements

KW - Vehicle emission

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055979662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055979662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s40825-018-0099-1

DO - 10.1007/s40825-018-0099-1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85055979662

VL - 4

SP - 247

EP - 259

JO - Emission Control Science and Technology

JF - Emission Control Science and Technology

SN - 2199-3629

IS - 4

ER -