Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evaluation of benazepril in cats with heart disease in a prospective, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial

  • Jonathan N. King
  • , Mike Martin
  • , Valérie Chetboul
  • , Luca Ferasin
  • , Anne T. French
  • , Günther Strehlau
  • , Wolfgang Seewald
  • , Sarah G.W. Smith
  • , Simon T. Swift
  • , Susan L. Roberts
  • , Andrea M. Harvey
  • , Christopher J.L. Little
  • , Sarah M.A. Caney
  • , Kerry E. Simpson
  • , Andrew H. Sparkes
  • , Eleanor J. Mardell
  • , Eric Bomassi
  • , Claude Muller
  • , John P. Sauvage
  • , Armelle Diquélou
  • Matthias A. Schneider, Laurence J. Brown, David D. Clarke, Jean Francois Rousselot

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Background: Heart disease is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in cats, but there is limited evidence of the benefit of any medication. Hypothesis: The angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor benazepril would delay the time to treatment failure in cats with heart disease of various etiologies. Animals: One hundred fifty-one client-owned cats. Methods: Cats with heart disease, confirmed by echocardiography, with or without clinical signs of congestive heart failure, were recruited between 2002 and 2005 and randomized to benazepril or placebo in a prospective, multicenter, parallel-group, blinded clinical trial. Benazepril (0.5-1.0 mg/kg) or placebo was administered PO once daily for up to 2 years. The primary endpoint was treatment failure. Analyses were conducted separately for all-cause treatment failure (main analysis) and heart disease-related treatment failure (supportive analysis). Results: No benefit of benazepril versus placebo was detected for time to all-cause treatment failure (P =.42) or time to treatment failure related to heart disease (P =.21). Hazard ratios (95% confidence interval [CI]) from multivariate analysis for benazepril compared with placebo were 1.00 (0.57-1.74) for all-cause failure, and 0.99 (0.50-1.94) for forward selection and 0.93 (0.48-1.81) for bidirectional selection models for heart disease-related failure. There were no significant differences between groups over time after administration of the test articles in left atrium diameter, left ventricle wall thickness, quality of life scores, adverse events, or plasma biochemistry or hematology variables. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance: Benazepril was tolerated well in cats with heart disease, but no evidence of benefit was detected.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2559-2571
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of veterinary internal medicine
Volume33
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Authors. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • ACE inhibitor
  • survival
  • treatment failure

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of benazepril in cats with heart disease in a prospective, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this