Evaluating the interpretations and use of curriculum-based measurement in reading and word lists for universal screening in first and second grade

Stacy Ann A. January, Scott P. Ardoin, Theodore J Christ, Tanya L. Eckert, Mary Jane White

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Universal screening in elementary schools often includes administering curriculum-based measurement in reading (CBM-R); but in first grade, nonsense word fluency (NWF) and, to a lesser extent, word identification fluency (WIF) are used because of concerns that CBM-R is too difficult for emerging readers. This study used Kane's argument-based approach to validation as a framework to evaluate the interpretations and use of scores resulting from screening 257 firstand second-grade students. First, scores from three word lists (decodable WIF, high-frequency WIF, and whole-word NWF) were examined as indicators of reading achievement. Then, the use of these word list scores was evaluated regarding their ability to classify at-risk readers accurately and as supplements to CBM-R during the winter universal screening period. Participants were also concurrently administered a norm-referenced measure of early reading skills and global reading achievement. Results suggested that the word lists were good indicators of reading achievement and provided support for using CBM-R or a word list in conjunction with CBM-R to discriminate among at-risk readers. Findings have implications for the administration of universal screeners in first and second grade.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)310-326
Number of pages17
JournalSchool Psychology Review
Volume45
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

Curriculum
Reading
school grade
curriculum
interpretation
Aptitude
supplement
elementary school
Students
ability

Cite this

Evaluating the interpretations and use of curriculum-based measurement in reading and word lists for universal screening in first and second grade. / January, Stacy Ann A.; Ardoin, Scott P.; Christ, Theodore J; Eckert, Tanya L.; White, Mary Jane.

In: School Psychology Review, Vol. 45, No. 3, 01.09.2016, p. 310-326.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2f74782b4e554171bd2e7a3119056e5d,
title = "Evaluating the interpretations and use of curriculum-based measurement in reading and word lists for universal screening in first and second grade",
abstract = "Universal screening in elementary schools often includes administering curriculum-based measurement in reading (CBM-R); but in first grade, nonsense word fluency (NWF) and, to a lesser extent, word identification fluency (WIF) are used because of concerns that CBM-R is too difficult for emerging readers. This study used Kane's argument-based approach to validation as a framework to evaluate the interpretations and use of scores resulting from screening 257 firstand second-grade students. First, scores from three word lists (decodable WIF, high-frequency WIF, and whole-word NWF) were examined as indicators of reading achievement. Then, the use of these word list scores was evaluated regarding their ability to classify at-risk readers accurately and as supplements to CBM-R during the winter universal screening period. Participants were also concurrently administered a norm-referenced measure of early reading skills and global reading achievement. Results suggested that the word lists were good indicators of reading achievement and provided support for using CBM-R or a word list in conjunction with CBM-R to discriminate among at-risk readers. Findings have implications for the administration of universal screeners in first and second grade.",
author = "January, {Stacy Ann A.} and Ardoin, {Scott P.} and Christ, {Theodore J} and Eckert, {Tanya L.} and White, {Mary Jane}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.17105/SPR45-3.310-326",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "310--326",
journal = "School Psychology Review",
issn = "0279-6015",
publisher = "National Association of School Psychologists",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating the interpretations and use of curriculum-based measurement in reading and word lists for universal screening in first and second grade

AU - January, Stacy Ann A.

AU - Ardoin, Scott P.

AU - Christ, Theodore J

AU - Eckert, Tanya L.

AU - White, Mary Jane

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Universal screening in elementary schools often includes administering curriculum-based measurement in reading (CBM-R); but in first grade, nonsense word fluency (NWF) and, to a lesser extent, word identification fluency (WIF) are used because of concerns that CBM-R is too difficult for emerging readers. This study used Kane's argument-based approach to validation as a framework to evaluate the interpretations and use of scores resulting from screening 257 firstand second-grade students. First, scores from three word lists (decodable WIF, high-frequency WIF, and whole-word NWF) were examined as indicators of reading achievement. Then, the use of these word list scores was evaluated regarding their ability to classify at-risk readers accurately and as supplements to CBM-R during the winter universal screening period. Participants were also concurrently administered a norm-referenced measure of early reading skills and global reading achievement. Results suggested that the word lists were good indicators of reading achievement and provided support for using CBM-R or a word list in conjunction with CBM-R to discriminate among at-risk readers. Findings have implications for the administration of universal screeners in first and second grade.

AB - Universal screening in elementary schools often includes administering curriculum-based measurement in reading (CBM-R); but in first grade, nonsense word fluency (NWF) and, to a lesser extent, word identification fluency (WIF) are used because of concerns that CBM-R is too difficult for emerging readers. This study used Kane's argument-based approach to validation as a framework to evaluate the interpretations and use of scores resulting from screening 257 firstand second-grade students. First, scores from three word lists (decodable WIF, high-frequency WIF, and whole-word NWF) were examined as indicators of reading achievement. Then, the use of these word list scores was evaluated regarding their ability to classify at-risk readers accurately and as supplements to CBM-R during the winter universal screening period. Participants were also concurrently administered a norm-referenced measure of early reading skills and global reading achievement. Results suggested that the word lists were good indicators of reading achievement and provided support for using CBM-R or a word list in conjunction with CBM-R to discriminate among at-risk readers. Findings have implications for the administration of universal screeners in first and second grade.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84999277541&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84999277541&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.17105/SPR45-3.310-326

DO - 10.17105/SPR45-3.310-326

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 310

EP - 326

JO - School Psychology Review

JF - School Psychology Review

SN - 0279-6015

IS - 3

ER -