Evaluating tenure cases for scholars active in emergent or non-mainstream is research topics

Jason Thatcher, Alok Gupta, Paulo Goes, Arun Rai, Monica Chiarini Tremblay

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

The number of topics and methods that our field is embracing is growing rapidly. This includes methodologies such as design science, analytics, neuro-IS and contextual areas such as healthcare IT or the public sector. This rapid expansion poses challenges for junior faculty engaged in this research, because external letter writers may struggle to understand how to evaluate their work. The outcomes of inquiry for these new methods or growing topics often vary from the "normal" metrics for productivity, such as journal publications, manifest in the broader IS discipline. How can we, as a field, develop a broader understanding of how to evaluate the tenure cases of individuals that use new methods or who investigate emerging topics? In this panel, we foster a conversation on how to, and if there is a need to, develop new metrics for evaluating tenure cases for scholars active in emergent or non-mainstream IS research topics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAMCIS 2016
Subtitle of host publicationSurfing the IT Innovation Wave - 22nd Americas Conference on Information Systems
PublisherAssociation for Information Systems
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016
Event22nd Americas Conference on Information Systems: Surfing the IT Innovation Wave, AMCIS 2016 - San Diego, United States
Duration: Aug 11 2016Aug 14 2016

Other

Other22nd Americas Conference on Information Systems: Surfing the IT Innovation Wave, AMCIS 2016
CountryUnited States
CitySan Diego
Period8/11/168/14/16

Fingerprint

Productivity

Keywords

  • Emergent fields
  • IS discipline
  • Tenure and promotion

Cite this

Thatcher, J., Gupta, A., Goes, P., Rai, A., & Tremblay, M. C. (2016). Evaluating tenure cases for scholars active in emergent or non-mainstream is research topics. In AMCIS 2016: Surfing the IT Innovation Wave - 22nd Americas Conference on Information Systems Association for Information Systems.

Evaluating tenure cases for scholars active in emergent or non-mainstream is research topics. / Thatcher, Jason; Gupta, Alok; Goes, Paulo; Rai, Arun; Tremblay, Monica Chiarini.

AMCIS 2016: Surfing the IT Innovation Wave - 22nd Americas Conference on Information Systems. Association for Information Systems, 2016.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Thatcher, J, Gupta, A, Goes, P, Rai, A & Tremblay, MC 2016, Evaluating tenure cases for scholars active in emergent or non-mainstream is research topics. in AMCIS 2016: Surfing the IT Innovation Wave - 22nd Americas Conference on Information Systems. Association for Information Systems, 22nd Americas Conference on Information Systems: Surfing the IT Innovation Wave, AMCIS 2016, San Diego, United States, 8/11/16.
Thatcher J, Gupta A, Goes P, Rai A, Tremblay MC. Evaluating tenure cases for scholars active in emergent or non-mainstream is research topics. In AMCIS 2016: Surfing the IT Innovation Wave - 22nd Americas Conference on Information Systems. Association for Information Systems. 2016
Thatcher, Jason ; Gupta, Alok ; Goes, Paulo ; Rai, Arun ; Tremblay, Monica Chiarini. / Evaluating tenure cases for scholars active in emergent or non-mainstream is research topics. AMCIS 2016: Surfing the IT Innovation Wave - 22nd Americas Conference on Information Systems. Association for Information Systems, 2016.
@inproceedings{eb55477d032a470d9f95f663d922be55,
title = "Evaluating tenure cases for scholars active in emergent or non-mainstream is research topics",
abstract = "The number of topics and methods that our field is embracing is growing rapidly. This includes methodologies such as design science, analytics, neuro-IS and contextual areas such as healthcare IT or the public sector. This rapid expansion poses challenges for junior faculty engaged in this research, because external letter writers may struggle to understand how to evaluate their work. The outcomes of inquiry for these new methods or growing topics often vary from the {"}normal{"} metrics for productivity, such as journal publications, manifest in the broader IS discipline. How can we, as a field, develop a broader understanding of how to evaluate the tenure cases of individuals that use new methods or who investigate emerging topics? In this panel, we foster a conversation on how to, and if there is a need to, develop new metrics for evaluating tenure cases for scholars active in emergent or non-mainstream IS research topics.",
keywords = "Emergent fields, IS discipline, Tenure and promotion",
author = "Jason Thatcher and Alok Gupta and Paulo Goes and Arun Rai and Tremblay, {Monica Chiarini}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
booktitle = "AMCIS 2016",
publisher = "Association for Information Systems",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Evaluating tenure cases for scholars active in emergent or non-mainstream is research topics

AU - Thatcher, Jason

AU - Gupta, Alok

AU - Goes, Paulo

AU - Rai, Arun

AU - Tremblay, Monica Chiarini

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - The number of topics and methods that our field is embracing is growing rapidly. This includes methodologies such as design science, analytics, neuro-IS and contextual areas such as healthcare IT or the public sector. This rapid expansion poses challenges for junior faculty engaged in this research, because external letter writers may struggle to understand how to evaluate their work. The outcomes of inquiry for these new methods or growing topics often vary from the "normal" metrics for productivity, such as journal publications, manifest in the broader IS discipline. How can we, as a field, develop a broader understanding of how to evaluate the tenure cases of individuals that use new methods or who investigate emerging topics? In this panel, we foster a conversation on how to, and if there is a need to, develop new metrics for evaluating tenure cases for scholars active in emergent or non-mainstream IS research topics.

AB - The number of topics and methods that our field is embracing is growing rapidly. This includes methodologies such as design science, analytics, neuro-IS and contextual areas such as healthcare IT or the public sector. This rapid expansion poses challenges for junior faculty engaged in this research, because external letter writers may struggle to understand how to evaluate their work. The outcomes of inquiry for these new methods or growing topics often vary from the "normal" metrics for productivity, such as journal publications, manifest in the broader IS discipline. How can we, as a field, develop a broader understanding of how to evaluate the tenure cases of individuals that use new methods or who investigate emerging topics? In this panel, we foster a conversation on how to, and if there is a need to, develop new metrics for evaluating tenure cases for scholars active in emergent or non-mainstream IS research topics.

KW - Emergent fields

KW - IS discipline

KW - Tenure and promotion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84987673660&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84987673660&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

BT - AMCIS 2016

PB - Association for Information Systems

ER -