TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating oversight of human drugs and medical devices
T2 - A case study of the FDA and implications for nanobiotechnology
AU - Paradise, Jordan
AU - Tisdale, Alison W.
AU - Hall, Ralph F.
AU - Kokkoli, Efie
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2009/12
Y1 - 2009/12
N2 - This article evaluates the oversight of drugs and medical devices by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) using an integration of public policy, law, and bioethics approaches and employing multiple assessment criteria, including economic, social, safety, and technological. Criteria assessment and expert elicitation are combined with existing literature, case law, and regulations in an integrative historical case studies approach. We then use our findings as a tool to explore possibilities for effective oversight and regulatory mechanisms for nanobiotechnology. Section I describes oversight mechanisms for human drugs and medical devices and presents current nanotechnology products. Section II describes the results of expert elicitation research. Section III highlights key criteria and relates them to the literature and larger debate. We conclude with broad lessons for the oversight of nanobiotechnology informed by Sections I-III in order to provide useful analysis from multiple disciplines and perspectives to guide discussions regarding appropriate FDA oversight.
AB - This article evaluates the oversight of drugs and medical devices by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) using an integration of public policy, law, and bioethics approaches and employing multiple assessment criteria, including economic, social, safety, and technological. Criteria assessment and expert elicitation are combined with existing literature, case law, and regulations in an integrative historical case studies approach. We then use our findings as a tool to explore possibilities for effective oversight and regulatory mechanisms for nanobiotechnology. Section I describes oversight mechanisms for human drugs and medical devices and presents current nanotechnology products. Section II describes the results of expert elicitation research. Section III highlights key criteria and relates them to the literature and larger debate. We conclude with broad lessons for the oversight of nanobiotechnology informed by Sections I-III in order to provide useful analysis from multiple disciplines and perspectives to guide discussions regarding appropriate FDA oversight.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=76149143415&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=76149143415&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00434.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00434.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 20122103
AN - SCOPUS:76149143415
VL - 37
SP - 598
EP - 624
JO - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics
JF - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics
SN - 1073-1105
IS - 4
ER -