Abstract
Increasingly, program managers are required to evaluate programs with multiple outcomes against costs. This is difficult when program outcomes are not easily translated into a common metric. This article compares cost benefit analysis with Multiple Attribute Utility Technology and discusses the application of judgment in both analytical techniques. Multiple Attribute Utility Technology is illustrated with a case example to demonstrate how it may be applied to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of programs with multiple intangible outcomes.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 301-316 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | American Journal of Evaluation |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2008 |
Bibliographical note
Copyright:Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Keywords
- Benefit cost
- Cost-benefit
- Cost-effectiveness
- Program evaluation
- Shadow pricing
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating intangible outcomes: Using multiattribute utility analysis to compare the benefits and costs of social programs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS