Abstract
Increasingly, program managers are required to evaluate programs with multiple outcomes against costs. This is difficult when program outcomes are not easily translated into a common metric. This article compares cost benefit analysis with Multiple Attribute Utility Technology and discusses the application of judgment in both analytical techniques. Multiple Attribute Utility Technology is illustrated with a case example to demonstrate how it may be applied to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of programs with multiple intangible outcomes.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 301-316 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | American Journal of Evaluation |
Volume | 29 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2008 |
Bibliographical note
Copyright:Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Keywords
- Benefit cost
- Cost-benefit
- Cost-effectiveness
- Program evaluation
- Shadow pricing