Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Ethical, legal, and policy challenges in field-based neuroimaging research using emerging portable MRI technologies: guidance for investigators and for oversight

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Researchers are rapidly developing and deploying highly portable MRI technology to conduct field-based research. The new technoloey will widen access to include new investigators in remote and unconventional settings and willfacilitate greater inclusion of rural, economically disadvantaged, and historically underrepresented populations. To address the ethical, legal, and societal issues raised by highly accessible and portable MRI, an interdisciplinary Working Group (WG) engaged in a multi-year structured process of analysis and consensus building, informed by empirical research on the perspectives of experts and the general public. This article presents the WG s consensus recommendations. These recommendations address technology quality control, design and oversight of research, including safety of research participants and others in the scanning environment, engagement of diverse participants, therapeutic misconception, use of artificial intelligence algorithms to acquire and analyze MRI data, data privacy and security, return of results and managing incidental findings, and research participant data access and control.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberlsae008
JournalJournal of Law and the Biosciences
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • neuroethics
  • neuroimaging
  • portable MRI
  • research ethics
  • rural and remote communities
  • vulnerable populations

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ethical, legal, and policy challenges in field-based neuroimaging research using emerging portable MRI technologies: guidance for investigators and for oversight'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this