Estimation of the coefficient of variation from laboratory analysis of split specimens for quality control in clinical trials

John E. Connett, Wondra Wong Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An explicit statistical model is proposed for the coefficient of variation for laboratory analyses of constituents of blood, serum, saliva, or other specimens. A method for computing the maximum likelihood estimate of the key parameter is described, and compared with two simpler noniterative estimates. Validity of the model is explored by analysis of data from the central laboratory of a large cooperative clinical trial. Simulation studies are employed to compare the accuracy of the three estimators of the coefficient of variation. For most laboratory measurements for which the model is valid, one of the two noniterative estimates is nearly as accurate and unbiased as the maximum likelihood estimate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)24-36
Number of pages13
JournalControlled Clinical Trials
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1990

Fingerprint

Quality Control
Likelihood Functions
Clinical Trials
Statistical Models
Saliva
Serum

Keywords

  • Coefficient of variation
  • bias
  • laboratory measurements
  • maximum likelihood
  • mean squared error

Cite this

Estimation of the coefficient of variation from laboratory analysis of split specimens for quality control in clinical trials. / Connett, John E.; Wong Lee, Wondra.

In: Controlled Clinical Trials, Vol. 11, No. 1, 01.01.1990, p. 24-36.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0bc1c1b8562e453ba3b46e2a10c255e6,
title = "Estimation of the coefficient of variation from laboratory analysis of split specimens for quality control in clinical trials",
abstract = "An explicit statistical model is proposed for the coefficient of variation for laboratory analyses of constituents of blood, serum, saliva, or other specimens. A method for computing the maximum likelihood estimate of the key parameter is described, and compared with two simpler noniterative estimates. Validity of the model is explored by analysis of data from the central laboratory of a large cooperative clinical trial. Simulation studies are employed to compare the accuracy of the three estimators of the coefficient of variation. For most laboratory measurements for which the model is valid, one of the two noniterative estimates is nearly as accurate and unbiased as the maximum likelihood estimate.",
keywords = "Coefficient of variation, bias, laboratory measurements, maximum likelihood, mean squared error",
author = "Connett, {John E.} and {Wong Lee}, Wondra",
year = "1990",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0197-2456(90)90029-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "24--36",
journal = "Controlled Clinical Trials",
issn = "0197-2456",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimation of the coefficient of variation from laboratory analysis of split specimens for quality control in clinical trials

AU - Connett, John E.

AU - Wong Lee, Wondra

PY - 1990/1/1

Y1 - 1990/1/1

N2 - An explicit statistical model is proposed for the coefficient of variation for laboratory analyses of constituents of blood, serum, saliva, or other specimens. A method for computing the maximum likelihood estimate of the key parameter is described, and compared with two simpler noniterative estimates. Validity of the model is explored by analysis of data from the central laboratory of a large cooperative clinical trial. Simulation studies are employed to compare the accuracy of the three estimators of the coefficient of variation. For most laboratory measurements for which the model is valid, one of the two noniterative estimates is nearly as accurate and unbiased as the maximum likelihood estimate.

AB - An explicit statistical model is proposed for the coefficient of variation for laboratory analyses of constituents of blood, serum, saliva, or other specimens. A method for computing the maximum likelihood estimate of the key parameter is described, and compared with two simpler noniterative estimates. Validity of the model is explored by analysis of data from the central laboratory of a large cooperative clinical trial. Simulation studies are employed to compare the accuracy of the three estimators of the coefficient of variation. For most laboratory measurements for which the model is valid, one of the two noniterative estimates is nearly as accurate and unbiased as the maximum likelihood estimate.

KW - Coefficient of variation

KW - bias

KW - laboratory measurements

KW - maximum likelihood

KW - mean squared error

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025231257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025231257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0197-2456(90)90029-2

DO - 10.1016/0197-2456(90)90029-2

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 24

EP - 36

JO - Controlled Clinical Trials

JF - Controlled Clinical Trials

SN - 0197-2456

IS - 1

ER -