TY - JOUR
T1 - Estimation of disease risk under bivariate models of multifactorial inheritance
AU - Moldin, Steven O.
AU - Rice, John P.
AU - Van Eerdewegh, Paul
AU - Gottesman, Irving I.
AU - Erlenmeyer‐Kimling, L.
AU - Risch, Neil J.
PY - 1990
Y1 - 1990
N2 - Adjunct consideration of both qualitative (affection status) and quantitative (correlated liability indicator) information to define a bivariate phenotype can increase considerably the accuracy and efficiency of disease risk estimation. A general approach for calculating morbid risks to offspring on the basis of parental affection status and an offspring quantitative trait is presented. We also describe two different bivariate models of multifactorial inheritance, as implemented in the computer programs POINTER and YPOINT, and make explicit their assumptions/constraints when estimating the within‐person and parent–offspring correlations necessary for calculation of morbid risks. We use psychometric family data on schizophrenia from the New York High‐Risk Project to estimate these correlations and illustrate our methods. Our results show that even when a trait is only moderately correlated with liability, incorporation of quantitative trait information can lead to resolution of a range of risk to offspring that is not possible through reliance on parental affection status alone. Bivariate models provide a useful methodology for incorporating quantitative indicators of liability in the investigation of genetically complex diseases.
AB - Adjunct consideration of both qualitative (affection status) and quantitative (correlated liability indicator) information to define a bivariate phenotype can increase considerably the accuracy and efficiency of disease risk estimation. A general approach for calculating morbid risks to offspring on the basis of parental affection status and an offspring quantitative trait is presented. We also describe two different bivariate models of multifactorial inheritance, as implemented in the computer programs POINTER and YPOINT, and make explicit their assumptions/constraints when estimating the within‐person and parent–offspring correlations necessary for calculation of morbid risks. We use psychometric family data on schizophrenia from the New York High‐Risk Project to estimate these correlations and illustrate our methods. Our results show that even when a trait is only moderately correlated with liability, incorporation of quantitative trait information can lead to resolution of a range of risk to offspring that is not possible through reliance on parental affection status alone. Bivariate models provide a useful methodology for incorporating quantitative indicators of liability in the investigation of genetically complex diseases.
KW - Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)
KW - bivariate phenotype
KW - indicators (correlates) of liability
KW - longitudinal high‐risk research
KW - multivariate normal distribution
KW - schizophrenia
KW - segregation analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025144911&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025144911&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/gepi.1370070507
DO - 10.1002/gepi.1370070507
M3 - Article
C2 - 2253871
AN - SCOPUS:0025144911
SN - 0741-0395
VL - 7
SP - 371
EP - 386
JO - Genetic epidemiology
JF - Genetic epidemiology
IS - 5
ER -