Estimating mean glomerular volume using two arbitrary parallel sections

Behzad Najafian, John M. Basgen, Michael Mauer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The most reliable method for estimation of mean glomerular volume (MGV), the disector/Cavalieri method, is technically demanding and time consuming. Other methods suffer either from a lack of precise correlation with the gold standard or from the need for a large number of glomeruli in the sample. Here, a new method (the 2-profile method) is described; it provides a reliable estimate of MGV by measuring the profile area of glomeruli in two arbitrary parallel sections. MGV was estimated in renal biopsies from 16 diabetic patients and 13 normal subjects using both the Cavalieri and the 2-profile methods. The range of individual glomerular volumes based on the Cavalieri measurements was 0.31 to 4.02 × 106 μm3. There was a high correlation between the two methods for MGV (r = 0.97; P < 0.0001). However, the 2-profile method systematically overestimated MGV (P = 0.0005, paired t test). This overestimation was corrected by introducing a multiplication factor of 0.91, after which statistical criteria of interchangeability with the Cavalieri method were met. The optimal distance between two sections was determined as 20 μm with a coefficient of variation of 7.4% in repeated measurements of MGV. On the basis of findings that values for MGV stabilize after ten glomeruli are measured by the disector/Cavalieri method, it was determined that the accuracy of MGV by the 2-profile method obtained by eight glomeruli was less than 7% different from ten in all cases. Thus, the 2-profile method is a practical alternative to the disector/Cavalieri method for estimating MGV, especially in small samples and blocks with limited residual tissue.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2697-2705
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American Society of Nephrology
Volume13
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2002

Fingerprint

Kidney
Biopsy

Cite this

Estimating mean glomerular volume using two arbitrary parallel sections. / Najafian, Behzad; Basgen, John M.; Mauer, Michael.

In: Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Vol. 13, No. 11, 01.11.2002, p. 2697-2705.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{83caca153cf5488daf3be6b291987776,
title = "Estimating mean glomerular volume using two arbitrary parallel sections",
abstract = "The most reliable method for estimation of mean glomerular volume (MGV), the disector/Cavalieri method, is technically demanding and time consuming. Other methods suffer either from a lack of precise correlation with the gold standard or from the need for a large number of glomeruli in the sample. Here, a new method (the 2-profile method) is described; it provides a reliable estimate of MGV by measuring the profile area of glomeruli in two arbitrary parallel sections. MGV was estimated in renal biopsies from 16 diabetic patients and 13 normal subjects using both the Cavalieri and the 2-profile methods. The range of individual glomerular volumes based on the Cavalieri measurements was 0.31 to 4.02 × 106 μm3. There was a high correlation between the two methods for MGV (r = 0.97; P < 0.0001). However, the 2-profile method systematically overestimated MGV (P = 0.0005, paired t test). This overestimation was corrected by introducing a multiplication factor of 0.91, after which statistical criteria of interchangeability with the Cavalieri method were met. The optimal distance between two sections was determined as 20 μm with a coefficient of variation of 7.4{\%} in repeated measurements of MGV. On the basis of findings that values for MGV stabilize after ten glomeruli are measured by the disector/Cavalieri method, it was determined that the accuracy of MGV by the 2-profile method obtained by eight glomeruli was less than 7{\%} different from ten in all cases. Thus, the 2-profile method is a practical alternative to the disector/Cavalieri method for estimating MGV, especially in small samples and blocks with limited residual tissue.",
author = "Behzad Najafian and Basgen, {John M.} and Michael Mauer",
year = "2002",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.ASN.0000033381.53882.25",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "2697--2705",
journal = "Journal of the American Society of Nephrology",
issn = "1046-6673",
publisher = "American Society of Nephrology",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimating mean glomerular volume using two arbitrary parallel sections

AU - Najafian, Behzad

AU - Basgen, John M.

AU - Mauer, Michael

PY - 2002/11/1

Y1 - 2002/11/1

N2 - The most reliable method for estimation of mean glomerular volume (MGV), the disector/Cavalieri method, is technically demanding and time consuming. Other methods suffer either from a lack of precise correlation with the gold standard or from the need for a large number of glomeruli in the sample. Here, a new method (the 2-profile method) is described; it provides a reliable estimate of MGV by measuring the profile area of glomeruli in two arbitrary parallel sections. MGV was estimated in renal biopsies from 16 diabetic patients and 13 normal subjects using both the Cavalieri and the 2-profile methods. The range of individual glomerular volumes based on the Cavalieri measurements was 0.31 to 4.02 × 106 μm3. There was a high correlation between the two methods for MGV (r = 0.97; P < 0.0001). However, the 2-profile method systematically overestimated MGV (P = 0.0005, paired t test). This overestimation was corrected by introducing a multiplication factor of 0.91, after which statistical criteria of interchangeability with the Cavalieri method were met. The optimal distance between two sections was determined as 20 μm with a coefficient of variation of 7.4% in repeated measurements of MGV. On the basis of findings that values for MGV stabilize after ten glomeruli are measured by the disector/Cavalieri method, it was determined that the accuracy of MGV by the 2-profile method obtained by eight glomeruli was less than 7% different from ten in all cases. Thus, the 2-profile method is a practical alternative to the disector/Cavalieri method for estimating MGV, especially in small samples and blocks with limited residual tissue.

AB - The most reliable method for estimation of mean glomerular volume (MGV), the disector/Cavalieri method, is technically demanding and time consuming. Other methods suffer either from a lack of precise correlation with the gold standard or from the need for a large number of glomeruli in the sample. Here, a new method (the 2-profile method) is described; it provides a reliable estimate of MGV by measuring the profile area of glomeruli in two arbitrary parallel sections. MGV was estimated in renal biopsies from 16 diabetic patients and 13 normal subjects using both the Cavalieri and the 2-profile methods. The range of individual glomerular volumes based on the Cavalieri measurements was 0.31 to 4.02 × 106 μm3. There was a high correlation between the two methods for MGV (r = 0.97; P < 0.0001). However, the 2-profile method systematically overestimated MGV (P = 0.0005, paired t test). This overestimation was corrected by introducing a multiplication factor of 0.91, after which statistical criteria of interchangeability with the Cavalieri method were met. The optimal distance between two sections was determined as 20 μm with a coefficient of variation of 7.4% in repeated measurements of MGV. On the basis of findings that values for MGV stabilize after ten glomeruli are measured by the disector/Cavalieri method, it was determined that the accuracy of MGV by the 2-profile method obtained by eight glomeruli was less than 7% different from ten in all cases. Thus, the 2-profile method is a practical alternative to the disector/Cavalieri method for estimating MGV, especially in small samples and blocks with limited residual tissue.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036838379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036838379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.ASN.0000033381.53882.25

DO - 10.1097/01.ASN.0000033381.53882.25

M3 - Article

C2 - 12397039

AN - SCOPUS:0036838379

VL - 13

SP - 2697

EP - 2705

JO - Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

JF - Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

SN - 1046-6673

IS - 11

ER -