TY - JOUR
T1 - Errors in pointing are due to approximations in sensorimotor transformations
AU - Soechting, J. F.
AU - Flanders, M.
PY - 1989
Y1 - 1989
N2 - We define an extrinsic frame of reference to represent the location of a point in extrapersonal space relative to a human subject's shoulder, and we define an intrinsic frame of reference to represent the orientation of the arm and forearm. We examined the relations between coordinates in the extrinsic and intrinsic frames of reference under two experimental conditions: when subjects made inaccurate movements by pointing to virtual targets in the dark and when they made accurate movements by pointing to actual targets in the light. When subjects made inaccurate movements, there was a close-to-linear relationship between the orientation angles of the arm (intrinsic coordinates) at its final position and the extrinsic coordinates of the target. When they made accurate movements, these relationships were more nonlinear. Specifically, arm and forearm elevations depended principally on target distance and elevation, whereas the two yaw angles depended mainly on the target's azimuth. We propose that errors in pointing occur because subjects implement a linear approximation to the transformation from extrinsic to intrinsic coordinates and that this transformation is one step in the proces of transforming a visually derived representation of target location into an appropriate pattern of muscle activity.
AB - We define an extrinsic frame of reference to represent the location of a point in extrapersonal space relative to a human subject's shoulder, and we define an intrinsic frame of reference to represent the orientation of the arm and forearm. We examined the relations between coordinates in the extrinsic and intrinsic frames of reference under two experimental conditions: when subjects made inaccurate movements by pointing to virtual targets in the dark and when they made accurate movements by pointing to actual targets in the light. When subjects made inaccurate movements, there was a close-to-linear relationship between the orientation angles of the arm (intrinsic coordinates) at its final position and the extrinsic coordinates of the target. When they made accurate movements, these relationships were more nonlinear. Specifically, arm and forearm elevations depended principally on target distance and elevation, whereas the two yaw angles depended mainly on the target's azimuth. We propose that errors in pointing occur because subjects implement a linear approximation to the transformation from extrinsic to intrinsic coordinates and that this transformation is one step in the proces of transforming a visually derived representation of target location into an appropriate pattern of muscle activity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024382278&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024382278&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1152/jn.1989.62.2.595
DO - 10.1152/jn.1989.62.2.595
M3 - Article
C2 - 2769350
AN - SCOPUS:0024382278
SN - 0022-3077
VL - 62
SP - 595
EP - 608
JO - Journal of neurophysiology
JF - Journal of neurophysiology
IS - 2
ER -