Error Argumentation Enhance Adaptability in Adults With Low Motor Ability

Chi Mei Lee, Jin Bo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations


The authors focused on young adults with varying degrees of motor difficulties and examined their adaptability in a visuomotor adaptation task where the visual feedback of participants' movement error was presented with either 1:1 ratio (i.e., regular feedback schedule) or 1:2 ratio (i.e., enhanced feedback schedule). Within-subject design was used with two feedback schedules counter-balanced and separated for 10 days. Results revealed that participants with greater motor difficulties showed less adaptability than those with normal motor abilities in the regular feedback schedule; however, all participants demonstrated similar level of adaptability in the enhanced feedback schedule. The results suggest that error argumentation enhances adaptability in adults with low motor ability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)297-308
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Motor Behavior
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jul 3 2016
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.


  • DCD
  • developmental coordination disorder
  • motor ability
  • motor learning
  • visual feedback
  • visuomotor adaptation


Dive into the research topics of 'Error Argumentation Enhance Adaptability in Adults With Low Motor Ability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this