Abstract
The authors are indebted to Stefan Felsner for pointing out an error in the proof o fLemma 5.2 [ER], which invalidates both the lemma and the proof of Theorem 5.1. Specifically, it is asserted in the proof of Lemma 5.2 that the binary relation > has no directed cycles, but in fact, for n = 6 and T the tiling having noninversions { 123,456}, it can be checked that this relation has the following directed cycle:
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 359 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Discrete and Computational Geometry |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Apr 1997 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum to Free Arrangement and Rhombic Tilings (Discrete & Computational Geometry, (1996), 15, 3, (307-340), 10.1007/BF02711498)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS