Abstract
The authors are indebted to Stefan Felsner for pointing out an error in the proof o fLemma 5.2 [ER], which invalidates both the lemma and the proof of Theorem 5.1. Specifically, it is asserted in the proof of Lemma 5.2 that the binary relation > has no directed cycles, but in fact, for n = 6 and T the tiling having noninversions { 123,456}, it can be checked that this relation has the following directed cycle:
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 359 |
Number of pages | 1 |
Journal | Discrete and Computational Geometry |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs |
|
State | Published - Apr 1997 |