Main Text (Cell Metabolism 19, 418–430; March 4, 2014) In the originally published version of this article, the number of mice stated to be used for analysis was mistakenly given as 858 instead of 715. This error does not affect the data, analysis, or conclusions reported in the paper. The authors apologize for any confusion that this error may have caused.
PubMed: MeSH publication types
- Published Erratum