TY - JOUR
T1 - Erratum
T2 - Measuring the wall depletion length of nanoconfined DNA (Journal of Chemical Physics (2018) 149 (104901) DOI: 10.1063/1.5040458)
AU - Bhandari, Aditya Bikram
AU - Reifenberger, Jeffrey G.
AU - Chuang, Hui Min
AU - Cao, Han
AU - Dorfman, Kevin D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Journal of Chemical Physics. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/6/7
Y1 - 2019/6/7
N2 - In Ref. 1, the wall potential for a silica surface in the Bionano Genomics buffer was incorrectly stated as having a constant value of ψwall ∼ 100 meV. Apart from the typographical error in the unit and the sign, the value is also incorrect. The solutions to Eqs. (5), (10), and (11) of Ref. 1 yield the results in Table I. The value of ψwall affects Figs. 2 and 6 of the original manuscript. Corrected figures appear here as Figs. 1 and 2. In the last paragraph of Sec. II of Ref. 1, the statement "the semiflexible chain model of Eq. (6) predicts δ ∼ 11.05λD, while the rodlike model of Eq. (7) predicts δ ∼ 4.73λD" should be replaced with "the semiflexible chain model of Eq. (6) predicts δ ∼ 10.49λD, while the rodlike model of Eq. (7) predicts δ ∼ 4.45λD." The remainder of Ref. 1 and the key conclusions are not affected by this erratum. (Table Presented).
AB - In Ref. 1, the wall potential for a silica surface in the Bionano Genomics buffer was incorrectly stated as having a constant value of ψwall ∼ 100 meV. Apart from the typographical error in the unit and the sign, the value is also incorrect. The solutions to Eqs. (5), (10), and (11) of Ref. 1 yield the results in Table I. The value of ψwall affects Figs. 2 and 6 of the original manuscript. Corrected figures appear here as Figs. 1 and 2. In the last paragraph of Sec. II of Ref. 1, the statement "the semiflexible chain model of Eq. (6) predicts δ ∼ 11.05λD, while the rodlike model of Eq. (7) predicts δ ∼ 4.73λD" should be replaced with "the semiflexible chain model of Eq. (6) predicts δ ∼ 10.49λD, while the rodlike model of Eq. (7) predicts δ ∼ 4.45λD." The remainder of Ref. 1 and the key conclusions are not affected by this erratum. (Table Presented).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066949930&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066949930&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1063/1.5108718
DO - 10.1063/1.5108718
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 31176330
AN - SCOPUS:85066949930
SN - 0021-9606
VL - 150
JO - Journal of Chemical Physics
JF - Journal of Chemical Physics
IS - 21
M1 - 219901
ER -