Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Erratum: First Amendment Protection for Online Platforms (Computer Law & Security Review: The International Journal of Technology Law and Practice (2019) 35(2) (199–213), (S0267364918303261), (10.1016/j.clsr.2018.12.002))

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Abstract

The United States is home to some of the largest online platforms in the world, in part due to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996. Section 230 provides platforms with extraordinarily broad immunity from lawsuits arising from user content. The statute is under unprecedented scrutiny, and Congress already has amended the statute to weaken its protections. This Article examines the First Amendment protections that would remain for online platforms if Congress were to entirely eliminate Section 230. After reviewing pre-Internet cases involving offline distributors such as bookstores and newsstands, this Article concludes that although the First Amendment would offer some protections to platforms, these protections would be limited and likely would require platforms to significantly alter their operations and business models.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number105340
JournalComputer Law and Security Review
Volume35
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2019
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: First Amendment Protection for Online Platforms (Computer Law & Security Review: The International Journal of Technology Law and Practice (2019) 35(2) (199–213), (S0267364918303261), (10.1016/j.clsr.2018.12.002))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this