Abstract
The United States is home to some of the largest online platforms in the world, in part due to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996. Section 230 provides platforms with extraordinarily broad immunity from lawsuits arising from user content. The statute is under unprecedented scrutiny, and Congress already has amended the statute to weaken its protections. This Article examines the First Amendment protections that would remain for online platforms if Congress were to entirely eliminate Section 230. After reviewing pre-Internet cases involving offline distributors such as bookstores and newsstands, this Article concludes that although the First Amendment would offer some protections to platforms, these protections would be limited and likely would require platforms to significantly alter their operations and business models.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Article number | 105340 |
| Journal | Computer Law and Security Review |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Oct 2019 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: First Amendment Protection for Online Platforms (Computer Law & Security Review: The International Journal of Technology Law and Practice (2019) 35(2) (199–213), (S0267364918303261), (10.1016/j.clsr.2018.12.002))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS